London Bridge Incident

I will be traveling through London Bridge tomorrow on the tube. I will be vigilant but refuse to let it stop me. If carrying on my normal day is one way to fight this war then I will do that even if there is a risk.

We're in London in 2 weekends time.
Won't stop me bringing my daughter.
Won't stop me voting this Thursday.
Won't stop me doing all I had planned.
 

Brave guy.

So not quite like scorzas accusation earlier that all the police ran away until the AROs got there....shameful :mad:

8 mins from the 999 call to dead bad guys is incredible.

Absolutely
 
Haha!
I don't need to say anything, what an idiot Del Boy is...
Good job Del Boy isnt contributing here eh?

You realise we were responding to Craig81 who said:
I'm not casting dispersions at the police, but does 50 rounds fired by 8 officers seem excessive to anyone else, when they were taking down 3 men? 3 men armed with knives and not guns?

Did they miss 47 times or did they just riddle them with bullets?

Hopefully we don't have to have a stick fight :)
 
I'm not casting dispersions at the police, but does 50 rounds fired by 8 officers seem excessive to anyone else, when they were taking down 3 men? 3 men armed with knives and not guns?

Did they miss 47 times or did they just riddle them with bullets?

They will have fired as many shots as required to stop the threat. In the chaos, some will likely have missed their targets and a single 5.56mm round isn't necessarily going to be effective.

Bear in mind these are not automatic weapons, so every round fired is a squeeze of the trigger that will have been assessed.
 
The alert level is pure political nonsense and always has been, this attack right after the downgrade just goes to further demonstrate that.

The government don't decide the terror alert level, it's done by the intelligence community. It's not political. The fact that we've had an attack after a downgrade shows that intelligence relies on what information comes in and this isn't complete. It's inevitable that some plots will go undetected.
 
I have to say I'm really struggling to grasp the old generic response attitude to this.

London is strong. We will never give in to terrorism. Our way of life won't change.

... and all the rest of it.

Until it happens again, then rinse and repeat.

That's zero comfort to me, we're now starting to face a situation where we have to fight fire with fire. Even if that means the profiling of people in potential problem areas/religions/groups. Could that make it worse? Possibly, but it's already getting worse.

"Love" will not defeat this threat, it won't do anything really. I'm not even sure of the best way to proceed, but holding hands and hoping for the best is a hopeless attitude. Admittedly it's an incredibly difficult situation - one I don't think we'll ever get a handle on.
 
I will be traveling through London Bridge tomorrow on the tube. I will be vigilant but refuse to let it stop me. If carrying on my normal day is one way to fight this war then I will do that even if there is a risk.

I'll be going through Waterloo, and I'll still be out on the South Bank at lunchtime. What else am I meant to do?
 
They could have killed a hell of a lot more had they put more thought into what they were doing but they seemed to have wanted to become martyrs.

Saying that, they could have easily smuggled automatic weapons from the continent by boat.
 
I'll be going through Waterloo, and I'll still be out on the South Bank at lunchtime. What else am I meant to do?
Carry on as normal. Can't let these bar stewards change the way we live our lives. That's the ultimate victory for them, other than the IS flag flying over Downing Street.
 
I'll be going through Waterloo, and I'll still be out on the South Bank at lunchtime. What else am I meant to do?
Same. Into Waterloo. Then on the tube through LB and out to Canary Wharf. Three prime targets; a mainline station, the underground and a large financial centre.

I won't change my way of life.

On another matter though we should stop all immigration from certain countries. I appreciate the recent terrorists have been home grown but that's still no reason to bring in more and more people from a radically different culture. We are at war and have to start toughening up.
 
Read about the SAS Blue Thunder squad stationed in London. Helicoptered onto London Bridge last night. Apparently have an Apache Gunship available for surveillance - that's pretty hardcore.

Sounds like the first person on the scene was a transport copper who had a crack at the chaps with his baton. Good lad!

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/london-attack-rugbyplaying-policeman-stabbed-in-face-after-fighting-terrorists-armed-only-with-his-a3556521.html?amp

8 mins from the 999 call to dead bad guys is incredible.

That can't be right as scorza said the police ran away as cowards ???????? Still waiting for scorza proof though........
 
I have to say I'm really struggling to grasp the old generic response attitude to this.

London is strong. We will never give in to terrorism. Our way of life won't change.

... and all the rest of it.

Until it happens again, then rinse and repeat.

That's zero comfort to me, we're now starting to face a situation where we have to fight fire with fire. Even if that means the profiling of people in potential problem areas/religions/groups. Could that make it worse? Possibly, but it's already getting worse.

"Love" will not defeat this threat, it won't do anything really. I'm not even sure of the best way to proceed, but holding hands and hoping for the best is a hopeless attitude. Admittedly it's an incredibly difficult situation - one I don't think we'll ever get a handle on.

We have thrown quite a bit of fire around already, there are 200,000 confirmed civilian casualties in iraq (lets ignore Libya/Syria etc) and just in the month of June the London attack is ranked 2 places below the Islamic State attack in Diyala in the ongoing Iraq Civil War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_June_2017
 
I have to say I'm really struggling to grasp the old generic response attitude to this.

London is strong. We will never give in to terrorism. Our way of life won't change.

... and all the rest of it.

Until it happens again, then rinse and repeat.

That's zero comfort to me, we're now starting to face a situation where we have to fight fire with fire. Even if that means the profiling of people in potential problem areas/religions/groups. Could that make it worse? Possibly, but it's already getting worse.

"Love" will not defeat this threat, it won't do anything really. I'm not even sure of the best way to proceed, but holding hands and hoping for the best is a hopeless attitude. Admittedly it's an incredibly difficult situation - one I don't think we'll ever get a handle on.

Now isn't the time to make knee jerk decisions. Scared people don't make good decisions.
 
We have thrown quite a bit of fire around already, there are 200,000 confirmed civilian casualties in iraq (lets ignore Libya/Syria etc) and just in the month of June the London attack is ranked 2 places below the Islamic State attack in Diyala in the ongoing Iraq Civil War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_June_2017

The issues are closer to home, we can drop all the bombs we like on the Middle East and short of causing absolutely massive damage it won't make a lot of difference.

Now isn't the time to make knee jerk decisions. Scared people don't make good decisions.

The people making the decisions shouldn't be scared, they need to be calculated and methodical and think of a way to try and solve this issue. I'm sure they are, and I hope it'll be good enough, but it probably won't be.
 
The first brave policeman on the scene was armed with a stick (baton) , faced with some Islamic brainwashed nutter wearing a suicide vest okay it was fake but he didn't know that and he was also carrying a ******* Bowie knife by all accounts.

all our cops should be routinely armed with a side arm as they are in places like Denmark and Germany.
 
The issues are closer to home, we can drop all the bombs we like on the Middle East and short of causing absolutely massive damage it won't make a lot of difference.



The people making the decisions shouldn't be scared, they need to be calculated and methodical and think of a way to try and solve this issue. I'm sure they are, and I hope it'll be good enough, but it probably won't be.

Glad you've put so much effort into thinking about the lives of hundreds of thousands of Civilians, would read again.
 
I have to say I'm really struggling to grasp the old generic response attitude to this.

London is strong. We will never give in to terrorism. Our way of life won't change.

... and all the rest of it.

Until it happens again, then rinse and repeat.

That's zero comfort to me, we're now starting to face a situation where we have to fight fire with fire. Even if that means the profiling of people in potential problem areas/religions/groups. Could that make it worse? Possibly, but it's already getting worse.

"Love" will not defeat this threat, it won't do anything really. I'm not even sure of the best way to proceed, but holding hands and hoping for the best is a hopeless attitude. Admittedly it's an incredibly difficult situation - one I don't think we'll ever get a handle on.
I don't disagree with the notion that statements of 'we will be strong' are, by thenselves not conductive to anything...but I do disagree that 'love' (and by that, I actually mean 'compassion') can't make a difference. See below - particularly in bold.

Was musing over what can be done to prevent these sort of things happening. In 'reverse chronological order' in respect of when they can be applied (although the last three or so can all be applied together).

Police units / emergency response (responding to attack after it has happened).

Increased security patrolling streets and events to decentivise random attacks.

Counter terrorism intelligence (trying to identify radicalisation in advance of attacks).

Communities from which radicalisation spawns being vigilant against those who may be susceptible to it and working with counter terrorism intelligence.

All people showing care and tolerance of one another including to those communities from which radicalisation spawns - leading by example and showing these potential angry young men it's not 'us and them', just 'us'.

Having the job and education opportunities within our society that can provide an alternative to the attractions of dangerous cults.

Careful foreign policy. Ensuring our international military involvement doesn't provide room for extremism to cultivate.

That's about it. I encourage others to think about whether they are stoking flames by isolating an entire religious group for the actions of these angry young men. The responsibility ultimately lies with those individuals themselves but I think there is something we can all do, even at the most minor level, that could help prevent these attacks.
 
Regarding the "fast" response of UK police. In 8 minutes one is able to WALK 1 km. There were no cops in 1km radius in the center of London?

And I find it absolutely ridiculous that cops in UK do not carry sidearms. WTF
 
Back
Top Bottom