@D.P. LOL. You've answered my questions with "There's probably no difference between BAME cyclists and any other cyclist", and yet you've come to the conclusion we should have discriminatory BAME cycling initiatives.
Because you've been taken in like the rest that we need to throw around buzzwords like "diversity" and they're magically relevant to all issues.
You know what this now means... discrimination. Special grants for BAME cyclists to get cheap bikes (etc). When really there should be discounts for anyone to get cheap bikes, because the objective should just be "encourage more cyclists", not "diversity".
This is a fake objective that just gives PC nut-jobs warm fuzzy feelings.
This is just complete nonsense.
What is this discriminatory initiative you are talking about?
Why keep only referring to BAME, why no mention of women, young males, lower income earners?
"Because you've been taken in like the rest that we need to throw around buzzwords like "diversity""
Coudln't be further from the truth, I even called put posters for mentioning diversity when the initiative has absolutely nothing to do with diversity.
You really are either trolling or have severe comprehension issues