Matched betting - who's done it and who's good at it? (No Referrals)

By the time my last Coral free bet from Cheltenham is used today I'll be about £350 in profit which I'm really pleased with given I was working so only had an hour before starting work and lunchtimee to pay any attention to it.
 
Just started doing this again. Made 32 quid from 2 free bets but betfred messed up and let me withdraw my winnings but then the horse I bet on got disqualified so they had my winnings back but not before the withdrawal was made so now I owe betfred 80 quid!

That's a shame.....keep the cash out and cut loose.

Betfred as a business are absolutely shameful, some of the worst CS and website availability I have ever witnessed.
 
Quick question, bet365 ask for your address history (previous address if you haven't lived somewhere for 3 years) when signing up, normally a company only does this when they run a credit check.

Is this the case? Seems strange they'd need to do that
 
YesBets newbie

Signed up and opened a coral and betfair accs. When doing the free £5 bets after qualifying when choosing your bet on the yesbets list then going to the coral or betfair sometimes the odds different to what yesbets list them (do I manually change them.

How far can I go on the free yes bets accounts
 
just had one of my bets going towards 3 free bets on ladbrooks Voided on betfair. no idea why. 16:15 Exeter lay bet. no idea why- messes up my potential profit and wastes my 10 free bet.
 
Does anybody alter their laying ratio if the bet is a long shot?

I'm thinking of doing a calculator that decides, using a table to choose the thresholds per sport / bet type, how risky a choice at the bookies is and calculating the lay to break even at the bookies should the long shot win but make more if not.

Without modelling it all properly and going back over my betting history to test, I'm guessing that in the long run you'd make more money?
 
Honestly you'll get taken care of much faster in the Facebook group. The chat is run by the guys who own the gig and much like you and me, they also have other commitments.
 
Does anybody alter their laying ratio if the bet is a long shot?

I'm thinking of doing a calculator that decides, using a table to choose the thresholds per sport / bet type, how risky a choice at the bookies is and calculating the lay to break even at the bookies should the long shot win but make more if not.

Without modelling it all properly and going back over my betting history to test, I'm guessing that in the long run you'd make more money?

So if you're talking about a normal qualifying matched bet, where you're likely to lose a little no matter the result, you can't both break even at the bookies and win more at the exchange. You can over or underlay but it improves one side and not the other, so if both sides start as a qualifying loss position then you can't make them both go up into neutral or positive.

If you're talking about a free bet then they both start as positive so you can overlay to break even at the bookies if your long shot wins but you gain little at the exchange for doing so.

The maths isn't exact here but it's close. If you have back and lay odds of £20 on a 20/1 long shot, with a SNR free bet your optimum position is probably £18.50 no matter what. Overlay to break even if the bookie wins and if it loses you're probably making £19.50 at the exchange - a pound more than locking in your £18.50. The extra reward doesn't seem worth it when you can lock in a decent profit. From a mathematical view point, unless you can find arbs equivalents on every free bet, the non matching odds and commission at the exchange will mean your idea is less profitable in the long run.

The calculators already exist to calculate an overlay. The one at tricky bet is quite good to use its advanced slider to see the positions at various states of lay: http://www.trickybet.net/lay-calculator
 
Quick question, bet365 ask for your address history (previous address if you haven't lived somewhere for 3 years) when signing up, normally a company only does this when they run a credit check.

Is this the case? Seems strange they'd need to do that

Most bookmakers will do a 'soft search' just to check your address and make sure you don't have previous accounts. Won't touch your file but it'll show up as a record search. Generally for anti-laundering reasons.
 
So if you're talking about a normal qualifying matched bet, where you're likely to lose a little no matter the result, you can't both break even at the bookies and win more at the exchange. You can over or underlay but it improves one side and not the other, so if both sides start as a qualifying loss position then you can't make them both go up into neutral or positive.

If you're talking about a free bet then they both start as positive so you can overlay to break even at the bookies if your long shot wins but you gain little at the exchange for doing so.

The maths isn't exact here but it's close. If you have back and lay odds of £20 on a 20/1 long shot, with a SNR free bet your optimum position is probably £18.50 no matter what. Overlay to break even if the bookie wins and if it loses you're probably making £19.50 at the exchange - a pound more than locking in your £18.50. The extra reward doesn't seem worth it when you can lock in a decent profit. From a mathematical view point, unless you can find arbs equivalents on every free bet, the non matching odds and commission at the exchange will mean your idea is less profitable in the long run.

The calculators already exist to calculate an overlay. The one at tricky bet is quite good to use its advanced slider to see the positions at various states of lay: http://www.trickybet.net/lay-calculator

It's more the little bets i do to keep activity on my accounts.

So last night there was a horse at 19s at the bookies and 16.5 on the exchange. The calculator gave me the stake to win an even amount on either result.

I calculated myself so that i broke even if the horse won (unlikely at 19) but made a bit more on the exchange win.

Sure enough the horse came nowhere so i made a bit more than if I'd laid to "de-risk" my return.

Over time i think you'd make more money off those little return mug bets than always balancing the return on if you are backing long odds at the bookies.

As it happens on the scenario above, the odds on the exchange dropped to 11 as i bet on the bookies site, so i made a killing!
 
Last edited:
It's more the little bets i do to keep activity on my accounts.

So last night there was a horse at 19s at the bookies and 16.5 on the exchange. The calculator gave me the stake to win an even amount on either result.

I calculated myself so that i broke even if the horse won (unlikely at 19) but made a bit more on the exchange win.

Sure enough the horse came nowhere so i made a bit more than if I'd laid to "de-risk" my return.

Over time i think you'd make more money off those little return mug bets than always balancing the return on if you are backing long odds at the bookies.

As it happens on the scenario above, the odds on the exchange dropped to 11 as i bet on the bookies site, so i made a killing!

Those aren't mug bets though - you're taking too much value.

Make a few of those regularly and the bookie will ban your account.
 
It's more the little bets i do to keep activity on my accounts.

So last night there was a horse at 19s at the bookies and 16.5 on the exchange. The calculator gave me the stake to win an even amount on either result.

I calculated myself so that i broke even if the horse won (unlikely at 19) but made a bit more on the exchange win.

Sure enough the horse came nowhere so i made a bit more than if I'd laid to "de-risk" my return.

Over time i think you'd make more money off those little return mug bets than always balancing the return on if you are backing long odds at the bookies.

As it happens on the scenario above, the odds on the exchange dropped to 11 as i bet on the bookies site, so i made a killing!

So @amigafan2003 makes a good point - bookies will cotton on

But that aside, what stops you from extending your theory the 18/1 shot won't win? Why not just lay the horse without backing it - it'll never win right?
 
Back
Top Bottom