But you are named after a cartoon wizard.
McCanns going too far?
- Thread starter Moley
- Start date
But you are named after a cartoon wizard.
You must blame my mother for that.
Caporegime
Soldato
I don't know any "Merlin" other than the cartoon wizard? I think I'm due a visit to wikipedia
come on then get your wallets out.
Scroungers,why should anyone pay for their legal team.
That really isn't going to help their public image......come on then get your wallets out.
Soldato
Well, imagine they're not guilty - and how much it will cost them to prove that... If they're not guilty (each to our own at the moment, until there's proof) then it'd only be a good thing if kind-hearted souls donated to them so they can get their names cleared and concentrate on finding the killers again.
But as I say, nobody know's yet. Although I still don't see how they could've done anything with a dead toddler 25 days after the media started covering them.
Yup, they need locking up.
just to quote that link i posted.....
PR firms? what ****** planet are this family on.
they earn well over 100k a year so i suggest they get back to work.
Doesnt matter if they are guilty or not,its their own case and such they should pay for it themselves and if they cant then get a cheaper lawyer or legal aid.
Thousands of people need lawyers each year but do they make public appeals asking for handouts to help?
Soldato
If my kid went missing I would milk the public for all the money I could, so I could find the killer. If I was then accused of killing my kid, then I wouldn't have a problem asking for help with legal fees from members of the public either.
They're not doing anything I wouldn't do.
They're not doing anything I wouldn't do.
Permabanned
Why do you need to fund a defence when:
1. Innocent until proven guilty.
2. The child was abducted.
3. They maintain their innocence.
4. They have not been charged with any offence.
5. There is no trial.
1. Innocent until proven guilty.
2. The child was abducted.
3. They maintain their innocence.
4. They have not been charged with any offence.
5. There is no trial.
So what exactly are they doing at the moment to find little Maddy? it seems that since they were called into suspicion they've just totally given up on finding her in favour of defending themselves...
Do they really want her to be found?
Why don't they for example offer 50% of the fund to anyone who can offer information leading to her discovery and the rest to the charity, at this rate she will never be found and the money will help neither finding Maddy or the charity as I doubt they will let go of it until she is found; and finding Maddy will get them off any jail sentence right?!?
Do they really want her to be found?
Why don't they for example offer 50% of the fund to anyone who can offer information leading to her discovery and the rest to the charity, at this rate she will never be found and the money will help neither finding Maddy or the charity as I doubt they will let go of it until she is found; and finding Maddy will get them off any jail sentence right?!?
Last edited:
Why should people have to donate money to fund their legal fees? They're both doctors, one is a consultant, so I imagine they're creaming in at least 100K per year between them. Did you see the house they live in, the rather large one with the two cars parked in the private drive?
Permabanned
The whole PR things niggles at me, I think Esther McVey is the owner of the PR firm that represents them.
I think it say a lot when Max Clifford represents Robert Murat and not the McCann's, for all his faults he is no idiot.
I think it say a lot when Max Clifford represents Robert Murat and not the McCann's, for all his faults he is no idiot.
Yep,downsize to something smaller i mean they can save money by needing one less bedroom now.
The money they have left over from the sale use that to pay your legal team.
Soldato