Soldato
That design looks utter turd.
Glaucus has his Microsoft shield out again.
Glaucus has his Microsoft shield out again.
If you were to present people with the new (Old?) logo I think a lot less people would recognise it compared to people being shown the old wavy looking logo.
That design looks utter turd.
Glaucus has his Microsoft shield out again.


Well, I like it. Clean, functional, effective. What Microsoft is (trying) to promote.
It's recognizable
Windows 8 is anything but functional.
I have used it for a few days in a virtual machine and I still can't stand it.

The wavy logo is windows, not Microsoft.
It's recognizable in a square as its a window in a recognizable colour configuration.
It's perfect for people who want simple access to their stuff though. Parents who just want their photos, websites, etc. I
?

Although his logos may be interpreted as simplistic, Rand was quick to point out in A Designer’s Art that “ideas do not need to be esoteric to be original or exciting." His American Broadcasting Company trademark, created in 1961, then used by ABC-TV in the fall of 1962, epitomizes that ideal of minimalism while proving Rand’s point that a logo “cannot survive unless it is designed with the utmost simplicity and restraint.”
So why not just adopt the Windows logo as the Microsoft logo? It's a lot more recognisable than the new one.
So why not just adopt the Windows logo as the Microsoft logo? It's a lot more recognisable than the new one.

That design looks utter turd.
Glaucus has his Microsoft shield out again.