I'm sure all these women and children engineers and doctors fleeing as refugees from war and persecution will enrich europe to no end.
They are probably updating their CVs as we speak.
Dirty dirty scum. First boat back home.
I'm sure all these women and children engineers and doctors fleeing as refugees from war and persecution will enrich europe to no end.
They are probably updating their CVs as we speak.
The footage is from mainland Africa. Where do you want them to go by boat.Dirty dirty scum. First boat back home.
You fail to answer direct questions put to you, while attempting to subvert the responses of others to fit the narrative you're trying to push.Only in a thread like this, with the regular contributors it attracts, could 2 posts like these be posted so close to each other without any sense of irony or comprehension of the hypocrisy involved.
Seems you want them to go by boat to mainland Europe, why not let them bring their homemade flamethrowers with them while we are at it.The footage is from mainland Africa. Where do you want them to go by boat.
If a government introduced an "open door" policy, immigration wouldn't be illegal.Garnett says he’s against illegal immigration. I don’t buy it. I reckon he wants a complete open door policy, regardless of the impact upon Europe.
Exactly, you want all immigration to be legal, no more controls at all.If a government introduced an "open door" policy, immigration wouldn't be illegal.
Maybe give that one a bit more thought.
There's no obligation to answer direct questions here... Otherwise the Trump fans and the Brexiteers would have been banned a long time ago.You fail to answer direct questions put to you, while attempting to subvert the responses of others to fit the narrative you're trying to push.
It's you who has the problem.
Ah, so when you said "illegal immigration", you didn't mean "illegal immigration".Exactly, you want all immigration to be legal, no more controls at all.
Ok, I’ll clean the question up for you.Ah, so when you said "illegal immigration", you didn't mean "illegal immigration".
Do you want to have another go?
Perhaps you meant "economic migration"?
I mean, I'm loathe to try and define your point for you, but it's painful...
No, I do not.Ok, I’ll clean the question up for you.
Do you believe that all barriers on economic migration should be dropped and everyone in the world should have the right to enter and reside in a different, more prosperous country, regardless of circumstances in their own country?
Well at least we can agree on that then.No, I do not.
They. Have. Crossed. A. Land. Border.Well at least we can agree on that then.
Those guys turning up on the beaches should be rounded up and sent straight back.
Ok, they should be found, rounded up and locked up until their deportation can be approved. They know full well they won’t be granted asylum, that’s why they all skidaddled away so quickly.They. Have. Crossed. A. Land. Border.
It should be hushed-up?And do you think RT, the Russian state broadcaster is eagar to publicise this out of the goodness of its heart, or because of the destabilising effect the rise in xenophobic Nationalism in Britain will have as a result?
Of course, lefties want everything hushed up, illegal immigration, Muslim sex gangs, immigrant crime, you name it, it’s got to be hushed up to avoid jeopardising this utopia of a multicultural society they fantasise about.It should be hushed-up?
Not at all. Some perspective and objectivity is what's needed, that's all.It should be hushed-up?
What perspective and objectivity do you need for that video? It’s hardly like the Russians decided not to show them fleeing from a Boko Harem attack is it?Not at all. Some perspective and objectivity is what's needed, that's all.