Not at all. Some perspective and objectivity is what's needed, that's all.
In what way? Where is it missing currently?
Not at all. Some perspective and objectivity is what's needed, that's all.
Back from the pub now, how are we doing with "garnett"? I recall him once saying he didn't do pubs, I guess face to face questions are not his forte. His visit from the left wing / liberal enclave of Speaker's Corner (IMHO) suggests he is hoping to quell any talk of anti migrant agendas. It's a waste of time, the rise of nationalism across the EU surpasses even my best hopes, he comes too late Even his self given intellectual aggrandisement is impotent against what citizens are seeing landing across their borders and on their shores, there's some serious trouble ahead for the Bloc, too long have they tried to make this economic and criminal migration sound like a nothing. Forget "Brexit", it's incidental, the real trouble for the EU lies outside its near none existent borders and it has proven totally incapable or unwilling to address it. Even sooner than I could have wished for the political aims of the European "Union" will be quashed by this unprecedented invasion. No wonder Juncker is staggering around.
I can practically hear the collective groan from around the bar when they see you walking up. It's all too easy to tell exactly what sort of pubgoer you must be. It is funny - when you're at you're most candid you seem like the target readership of the Daily Mail from the 70 years ago - "Hurrah, the Blackshirts", eh? You appear happy to serve as an example of what happens when, for decades, somebody is served that daily dose of hate that the editor of Daily Mail said was their goal each day.
They're not in need, they're simply trying to steal something that is better than what they already have.if they are in need of help from European countries they really aren't helping themselves by coming into countries fighting and committing numerous other crimes.
That's pretty much what I was getting at. If I was in need of help from another country (or even from another person) the last thing I would do would be acts of a criminal nature.They're not in need, they're simply trying to steal something that is better than what they already have.
Genuine LOL moment with that last comment! True though, why have kids if they don't have the means to support them. Have they just gotten into the mindset that they have the means to support their growing family because of foreign aid. I also think there needs to be further scrutiny with where the money goes from the charities, taking Camila Batmanghelidjh and the children's charity as an example.Over breeding, there isn't enough aid to cover them all. It's only going to get worse, the more they populate the more problems they have and the more they want what we have.
We need to add a contraceptive into their drinking supplies to slow down their numbers. I read the average woman in Africa has nearly 5 kids...
Genuine LOL moment with that last comment! True though, why have kids if they don't have the means to support them. Have they just gotten into the mindset that they have the means to support their growing family because of foreign aid. I also think there needs to be further scrutiny with where the money goes from the charities, taking Camila Batmanghelidjh and the children's charity as an example.
It's a cultural thing. Morality is sky high in Africa, so they have as many kids as possible to ensure that a good amount survives into adulthood.
Problem is, this is terrible when you reach a first world country where the kids won't die because then you just get overbreeding and an eventual demographic shift, and it will take a few generations before that attitude changes (with the numbers coming in, that is already way too late).
Has no one pointed out the irony in garnett sharing his name with a certain man whose views were the polar opposite to his own?
People really need to understand this.This video is quite an eye opener: