Mitt Romney

Is like a **** sucking contest between the 2 parties. Romney just claims he can suck harder.

Hillary Clinton: "We will use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18852286

She has been going on about bombing Iran since 2008, but I don't think it happened because the US was spread to thin. Wait for Obama to "end" the OIF/OEF wars, regroup the troops in Kuwait or somewhere and then BOMB Iran.
 
LOL. AMERICA.

What was funniest about Clint Eastwood's speech at the RNC Tampa thing was that he said politicians are just there to beg for votes and that it doesn't matter if you're a republican, democrat, libetarian or anything else, as long as the people in charge are getting the job done and that Obama isn't getting the job done and so needs to be moved on, I don't think I've actually heard him endorse Romney, just the republicans to get Obama out. Hell he even got a cheer from the crowd when he talked about taking all the troops out of the warzones lol as if it wasn't the republicans that put them there in the first place :p

The US is a joke oh, and don't let my sig fool you :p

If I was an American with the vote I would take my ticket home and burn it on youtube.
 
Last edited:
Without wanting to sound like I'm defending Romney, this idea that a vote for him is a certain war with Iran is a little disingenuous.

Why Romney Won't Fight Iran

Cross-party support for bombing Israel's biggest enemy?? Noooo that would never happen. Democrat rep Steve ISRAEL would never go for that. Neither would Feinstein, Lieberman, Blumenthal, Schultz, Cohen, etc. :rolleyes:

Obama's former chief of staff served in the bloody IDF.
 
Firstly, Iran are the only country that have made statements of intent to use them and talking about "wiping" another country off the map.

:rolleyes:

Utter nonsense, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never said anything of the sort but well done for continuing this complete falsehood years after it's been debunked by many experts!

I fear many Americans are like you and believe any old nonsense the right-wing warmongering media put out!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/jun/14/post155
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/mehdi-hasan/2012/03/israel-iran-rentoul
 
Without wanting to sound like I'm defending Romney, this idea that a vote for him is a certain war with Iran is a little disingenuous.

Why Romney Won't Fight Iran

That article totally fails to address the Israel situation. When Israel attacks Iran (which it will) the US will be dragged into the mess one way or another. Therefor they'll want to keep things under their own control as much as possible. Romney or Obama are going to have to deal with Iran, even though they would probably be perfectly happy with a containment/stalling strategy instead. Unfortunately, Israel has them over a barrel. When Netanyahu visited Washington a few weeks ago, the plans were set in stone.
 
Cross-party support for bombing Israel's biggest enemy?? Noooo that would never happen. Democrat rep Steve ISRAEL would never go for that. Neither would Feinstein, Lieberman, Blumenthal, Schultz, Cohen, etc. :rolleyes:

Obama's former chief of staff served in the bloody IDF.

Well if you're saying America will attack Iran whoever's in charge you are agreeing with me. I was merely arguing against the notion that Romney getting in would mean definite war with Iran whereas an Obama win would avoid it.
 
Relevant image:
iranzl.jpg


The only reason Iran can't have nukes is because then they cannot be 'liberated' by us in the coming years, look at a map Iran is surrounded by US forces and the sanctions already placed on them is an act of war.

The only reason they want nukes to prevent their country going the way of Iraq/Libya/Syria with a puppet government installed.

Thats one of the most selective use of facts i've seen in a long time.

Kuwait ? Korea ? The US was not around at the start of either of those conflicts. China 1950-1953 ? Seriously ? It was the Chinese that rolled over the border, I suppose the Americans were supposed to surrender themselves into the loving embrace of the PLA.

Yet Iran doesn't get mentioned in Lebanon (despite being major backers of Hezbollah) or Afghanistan (despite Iranian made munitions turning up in the hands of dead Taliban)
 
^ I was thinking that too. Also, you can't have Afghanistan 2001 on one side and not have Iraq on the the other. Iran bombed Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war. Granted they were attacked first, but so were America.
 
^^ They also missed out the part where Iran was supporting the Northern Alliance in their fight against the Taliban in the late 90s. The Iranians almost invaded Afghanistan at one point but were talked out of it by the UN and the US. Oh the trouble they could have saved us.
 
I've noticed Romney sucks his teeth or tuts at the beginning of almost every sentence. It annoys me to the point I can't listen to him without thinking about it!
 
bah! All of them are the same, they all want to invade and bomb Iran and cause another war which they will get in further debt and destabilise the middle east some more. Honestly they are war hungry not a single year has gone by they haven't been in war, blood thirsty and money greedy pigs.

Personally I would have voted for Ron Paul if I was an American citizen but I guess the voting fraud and RNC sham happening it isn't going to be possible anymore.

Onward with the corrupt government!

btw this video is going viral.


And this is just disgusting.

 
I think America will cause WWIII

.. & it will be with China in a few years for what's left of the world's oil. Not a question of if but when. I just hope I will be too old to care when it happens.

This Mitt Romney is just another politician who's convinced enough people to get where he is today & needs to convince some more to get the job he wants. Doesn't mean to say He'll be any good at that Job if he gets it (like most of them) :(
 
china will have another revolution before then (possibly even with a little help from the CIA). They are on shaky ground already. Lots and lots of the higher ups in China have second homes in the US, ready to flee to with their ill gotten gains when things go pear shaped. That place is corrupt beyond belief.
 
bah! All of them are the same, they all want to invade and bomb Iran and cause another war which they will get in further debt and destabilise the middle east some more. Honestly they are war hungry not a single year has gone by they haven't been in war, blood thirsty and money greedy pigs.

Personally I would have voted for Ron Paul if I was an American citizen but I guess the voting fraud and RNC sham happening it isn't going to be possible anymore.

Onward with the corrupt government!

btw this video is going viral.

To be fair, if the Tea party are against it, its screwing them out of votes and that can't be anything but good for the entire planet, the Tea party are the worst republicans have, not least because they aren't republicans, they're something entirely different, entirely worse and entirely should not be allowed to get into power under any circumstances.

The whole political process is a joke and Obama hasn't done a damn thing, gets a nobel peace prize for promising to pull out of wars the day he enters office, and doesn't.... but because he said it, which Bush, McCain and Hilary all said(but with a realistic time frame, one that Obama didn't beat) he gets a peace prize. Useless healthcare plan, generally doing nothing to help fight the real problems in the USA/world.

They can all suck it, the USA has been so massively opposed to communism because they are flat out scared to death of a country actually achieving everyone living together peacefully and relatively equally(we've not seen it close to achieved anywhere in the world but the fundamental goal is there), because if poor american's, which is, most of them, see another country where rich people aren't rich and poor people aren't poor, the super rich folk in america lose their country, their fortune and their power and have paid for wars to prevent it. America/politicans are about the money, securing their own wealth, making more of it and keeping the world in prime position for them to stay in power. Who is in charge is irrelevant.

Clinton may be the single worst president in the past 70-80 years, a LOT of what he did, repealing banking legislation, introducing bills that kicked in as he left office, borrowing MASSIVELY from social security to pay off other debt short term to LOOK good but hurt the country long term drastically, increase spending drastically.

Bush wasn't nearly as bad as some people think, Clinton was so monumentally responsible for a LOT of what happened in the years after he left office. Ultimately their stupid little games are to distract "the people". Democrats and republicans do the same thing make the rich richer and the poor poorer, and every 4 years they come out and cry about how the other side is at fault, stupid american's think the guys who want to do it "the other way" will help them, elect them in, and get the same stuff happening over and over again. Democrats/Republicans, its a show, its a distraction, the same decisions about the KEY things that effect everyones lives are the same, the small details, abortion, healthcare, they never really change but the parties use these things to swing the votes and make people think voting for either of the parties might be worthwhile.


It's like 3 guys robbing a bank, one guy goes round the bank while 2 guys have an argument outfront and the whole world watches the guys arguing because we love watching people argue. It doesn't matter who wins the argument, or who the crowd decides to believe, the bank still got robbed.
 
Back
Top Bottom