i find monaco boring because the track is so narrow and overtaking is almost impossible.
i dont mind if theres not a lot of overtaking aslong as theres room for it to happen, i dont care about the glamour of monaco it means nothing to me.
But thats the point? It the environment that makes it what it is.
It's a race. Not a convention
Are you saying the FA Cup Final would be the same if it was held on a playing field?
Agreed.
But as usual there are people who complain. We have modern tracks with massive run offs where the driver could make a cup of tea and discuss the weather before hitting anything, and they complain its boring and not challenging enough. Yet we then come to Monaco where the drivers need to be on it 110% as there is zero run off, and they complain its boring and processional
Personally, I love it, as I appreciate the skill involved in racing around it.
The only reason Monaco is still used is because of the off the track features. If a new track had Monaco's similar design, it would get shot to bits by critics.
If you think in terms of football, a 2-1 match can be infinitely more exciting than a 10-1 match.
Yeah but not as exciting as a 10-9 where the lead keeps changing
I understand the concentration thing but the last Monaco that sticks in my mind is the one panis one, so for me it barely registers. The qualifying is my fav bit. Watching a faster car weave behind for 50 laps does little for me because it doesn't take much race craft to keep them behind.
I do understand why it stays though and that the track is marmite.
It would help if we didn't have Valencia which is the same sort of thing as Monaco, but just dire on all levels.