Soldato
Like I say, gut feel. It feels like there's a 2008-esque financial crash looming and these banks have no real depth to draw on.What makes you think this?
I'm no expert, it's just pure spidey sense.
Like I say, gut feel. It feels like there's a 2008-esque financial crash looming and these banks have no real depth to draw on.What makes you think this?
What are they exposed to exactly? It's not like they're laden down with dodgy debt. They're more service providers than traditional high street banks, starling don't offer loans or mortgages, and seem very reluctant to even allow overdraftsLike I say, gut feel. It feels like there's a 2008-esque financial crash looming and these banks have no real depth to draw on.
I'm no expert, it's just pure spidey sense.
What are they exposed to exactly? It's not like they're laden down with dodgy debt. They're more service providers than traditional high street banks, starling don't offer loans or mortgages, and seem very reluctant to even allow overdrafts
Maybe I'll stick with natwest for now...also think I get breakdown cover with my natwest account vs paying slightly extra with Monzo.Their annual reports state they are 'a going concern', so not exactly great.
Will be interesting to see the 2022 report.
Their annual reports state they are 'a going concern', so not exactly great.
Will be interesting to see the 2022 report.
The concept of going concern
An entity prepares financial statements on a going concern basis when, under the going concern assumption, the entity is viewed as continuing in business for the foreseeable future. The term ‘foreseeable future’ is not defined within ISA 570, but IAS 1®, Presentation of Financial Statements deems the foreseeable future to be a period of at least 12 months from the end of the reporting period.
The concept of going concern is an underlying assumption in the preparation of financial statements, hence it is assumed that the entity has neither the intention, nor the need, to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of its operations. If management conclude that the entity has no alternative but to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of its operations, the going concern basis cannot be used and the financial statements must be prepared on a different basis (such as the ‘break-up’ basis).
indeed, not to be confused with "of ongoing concern"!That's standard and something you'll see on the financial statements of even the most profitable and cash rich companies out there. The issue would be if it said they weren't a going concern!
That's standard and something you'll see on the financial statements of even the most profitable and cash rich companies out there. The issue would be if it said they weren't a going concern!
The risk our plans don’t deliver the expected financial and non-financial benefits to our stakeholders, could also lead to a loss of confidence, reputational damage or difficulty fundraising. So as mentioned in Note 1 of the financial statements, the Directors recognise this risk casts a material uncertainty over our ability to continue as a going concern.
This is completely normal. Go and download any annual report from any company, they will have a section listing all the potential risks to the company.Yea I think I've misused that term, but in this context from the report it makes more sense with what you said:
We face challenges in developing major projects, particularly in geographically and technically challenging areas. Poor investment choice, efficiency or delivery, or operation challenges at any major project that underpins production or production growth, could adversely affect our financial performance.
Not sure how often "obtaining funding" to maintain operations is a material risk tbh.This is completely normal. Go and download any annual report from any company, they will have a section listing all the potential risks to the company.
e.g. one of the many risk entries in BP's last annual report -
Monzo may be a turd ( I don't know), but known risks in the annual report isn't a warning sign they are going down the toilet....merely that it is an identified potential risk.
I'd imagine funding drying up being a material risk to most financial institutions(see 2007/8) and growth startups.Not sure how often "obtaining funding" to maintain operations is a material risk tbh.
That's standard and something you'll see on the financial statements of even the most profitable and cash rich companies out there. The issue would be if it said they weren't a going concern!
There’s a Curve card for that.Hmmm...shame Starling don't offer the phone insurance/holiday insurance combo
Is there a graceful exit process for failed banks (like home utility providers)?LiE misquoted the report. It was that E&Y feared for Monzo as a going concern, as in, unless it does something soon to raise cash and stem loss it will be going out of business
Anyway, we know Monzo isn't really going anywhere. It's not an issue given the number of organisations would be lining up to gain 4m+ UK banking customers.
Interested in this too. I am considering this in a couple of years when my daughter is a bit older.Are any of you using Starling or Monzo for a child's account?
Are they popular? Can you give me a brief splainer?There’s a Curve card for that.
Is there a graceful exit process for failed banks (like home utility providers)?
I did some digging, Starling do a facility that looks like you can allocate a pot from your account to link to a debit card. It costs £2 per month and I'm not sure that's worth it for managing her pocket money TBH.Interested in this too. I am considering this in a couple of years when my daughter is a bit older.
Are they popular? Can you give me a brief splainer?