more PC garbage

But the women aren't professional footballers. They're part time players. They do all those things that are described. How is telling the truth sexist?

That's how I read it too, although I don't follow football so I have no idea if they are full-time footballers or not. :)
 
Why do women have smaller feet?



So they can stand closer to the counter.



//Seriously though, this is absurd. Some people need to get a life. No sexism was intended, get over yourself.
 
I weep for the children tbh. Let's just hope they are not forced to learn knitting in class and have extra knitting homework in P4 like i had. That one really messed me up...

Thanks feminists.
 
Didn't they lose anyway? I am against the misuse of the term heroes.

I didn't know there was a kitchen world cup.

They did lose, but in the third place play off one of the co-commentators (ex england women) said that they have proved that they are 'winners', so I'm sure that the hotly contested final was irrelevant as the winners had been given their bronze medal :p
 
Serious hat on...

Historically in this country women were thought of mainly in relation to men (e.g. known as Mrs John Smith) and were mainly for producing children.

(In some countries this kind of thing is still common, an extreme example being Saudi Arabia where every women has a male "guardian" who decides everything for her.)

An ongoing aim for feminists is to remove these comparisons and allow women to be thought of as their own agents.

The tweet therefore was problematic because it suggested these women, having now returned from their footballing trip, can go back to "being [subservient] mothers, partners and daughters".

We get the intended point of it, but between the lines it's definitely sexist. The more people are aware of this subtle sexism the better.
 
It seems pretty clear to me and very obviously sexist. That headline would never be used for men, because it's seen as OK that they are professional footballers. However, for some that isn't extended to female players. Instead, it's something they do part time and now that's over they are back to doing their subservient roles.
It was extremely poor taste, and very sexist.

I disagree with you, and actually think that this demonstrates how far we still have to come to tackle inequality in gender.

This.

It is a disgustingly sexist comment that has no place in the 20th century let alone 21st..
 
Yea so much inequality. Imagine the horror of the tweet hahaha. Tell me when was the last time you saw a woman losing her kid in custody, Or the last time you saw female drunks down in the boozer talking about how cursed men are? Or how many women in relation to men commit suicide?

How people can be offended here blows my mind...
 
serious hate? it's only sexist from a twisted feminazi view point

as someone said
Our lions go back to being fathers, partners and sons but they have taken on another title: heroes...

would be totally fine.


What happened to the woman the other month that ran away with her kid after the husband won custody ?

It seems like nothing did however if a man had absconded with a child he lost in a custody battle he would probably be branded a paedo and the child is at serious risk of harm, them a massive jail sentence for kidnapping or whatever.
you can't have selective feminism only when you gain an advantage love, calm down dear


Then all the teachers getting a slap on the wrist for sleeping with teenagers when a man gets sent down for years, now that's sexist
 
Last edited:
serious hate? it's only sexist from a twisted feminazi view point

But these are men in here :o

Then all the teachers getting a slap on the wrist for sleeping with teenagers when a man gets sent down for years, now that's sexist

I actually saw this in the side news reel on the BBC. She avoided jail too i was shocked.
 
It's nonsense. People who go looking for problems will always find them. I've had enough of certain parts of society always playing the victim. The tweet wasn't demeaning in any way, unless you want to make it demeaning... in which case.... INTERNET OUTRAGE CANNON!!
 
While I'd call the wording a bit questionable it looks to be part of an article following the team meeting their family after coming home. Doesn't seem much wrong with that. If you had a picture of Messi hugging his wife and son at the airport with a similar quote underneath you probably wouldn't bat an eyelid to be honest.
 
This womans world cup football has been 100 times better than the cry baby over paid mens football we have these days. That is a fact.

You seem to be struggling with the word "fact". The womens world cup has generally been of rubbish quality. The pace the game is played at, the skill of 95% of players and the goalkeeping is all very poor. I have watched quite a few games and the standard of womens football has increased but its still generally rubbish.
 
From what I understand the tweet was in reference to the footballers returning to their families to which they are quite clearly partners, mothers and daughter (as well as aunts, nieces etc....)

I don't personally see this as belittling at all as it is a statement of fact without obvious intention to be derogatory.
 
the cry baby over paid mens football we have these days

To be fair the men bar Gazza are not molly cuddled like babies. Can you imagine the look on the faces of Rooney and Ronaldo when you give them the "everyone is a winner" line and tell them that they are heroes because they came third? Facepalm... :confused:

That is the same line they give to children in sports day LOL! So what does this mean are the England womens team a bunch of babies? Or are they "Heroes" because of thier gender? Surely that is a bit sexist just to laud them because they are women no? How would a feminist justify that?


Swish :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom