I'd say quite the opposite. The changes they've forced the teams to make (more downforce, less power) are just going to make it less likely someone will go off. Once some one does go off the car is still going to take off if it gets turned into the airflow. The officials are basically burying their heads in the sand and hoping there won't be another crash.
Except that the changes included the aerodynamic configuration of both Chevrolet and Honda cars, ie the front and rear wings, sidepods, wheel guards and any interconnecting components.
Unfortunately the above is an opinion I posted elsewhere before Hinchcliffe's crash and whilst his incident is, on the face of it, totally different to the other three the fact that the car picked up on to its side so easily even after having lost most of it's speed only reinforces my point.
After the right side of the car was smashed against the SAFER barrier in a 125G impact. That's down to weight and momentum (the car didn't tilt until it reached the inside of the track.
Not surprised to see this kind of ignorant post from someone that never follows oval racing though...
I will add that the practice session was halted to investigate the suspension issue that caused the driver injury. As for oval racing in general, if even guys from the F1 farm system like Jack Harvey, Max Chilton (in Indy Lights) and others think they can participate safely, I'm inclined to listen to them as they are the ones strapping into the cockpit accepting a degree of risk (as with any motorsport).
Last edited: