Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
^
A good point, could be AMD pulling another Bulldoder where they release a product with the idea of catering to newer tech at the expense of older tech. Bulldozer got a lot of stick on release for having bad clock for clock speeds and because very few games made use of all the cores, scores were as bad or lower than i3s in many cases. The opinion on FX chips some what changed as more cores were being used.
I like to think this is the GPU equivalent but with Memory speed being sacrificed for bandwidth to cater for higher resolutions at the expense of low resolutions.
The poor performance at 1080p is AMD's driver overhead and not the memory speed. Under the few dx12 games that have been benchmarked things look better. You can see this on the 2 and 3 series as well.