• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

My GSYNC experiences

Thanks.

Great work btw, appreciate your feedback/review. :)

No worries. Its interesting technology and I don't mind playing guinea pig either. My only real genuine concern is that this technology pigeon holes me into buying only Nvidia GPUs. Sure my last few have been from the green camp, but I'm by no means bias. I value silence over raw performance and I'd have probably bought a 295x if it was out in january instead of my 2x 780 ti's. Nvidia confirmed in an event last year that they won't licence the technology out to other companies, which I feel is a shame with this as it should be something that everyone can enjoy.
 
No worries. Its interesting technology and I don't mind playing guinea pig either. My only real genuine concern is that this technology pigeon holes me into buying only Nvidia GPUs. Sure my last few have been from the green camp, but I'm by no means bias. I value silence over raw performance and I'd have probably bought a 295x if it was out in january instead of my 2x 780 ti's. Nvidia confirmed in an event last year that they won't licence the technology out to other companies, which I feel is a shame with this as it should be something that everyone can enjoy.

I hear you. I think AMD will have an alternative solution eventually, likely FreeSync, but Nvidia beat them to the punch this time around so credit to them.
 
I hear you. I think AMD will have an alternative solution eventually, likely FreeSync, but Nvidia beat them to the punch this time around so credit to them.
The only downside at the moment is that the limited range of monitor that actually support GSYNC.

I have said this before...if there's a decent Gsync 21:9 monitor out at a reasonable price, I would probably be tempted to build one more gaming PC with an Nvidia card for playing it...but of course, I would have to somehow find an opportunity to test out Gsync personally before investing like over £1K for the new PC plus monitor.
 
Nvidia confirmed in an event last year that they won't licence the technology out to other companies, which I feel is a shame with this as it should be something that everyone can enjoy.

This is the very reason I lean towards AMD if specs are similar. Not a fan of Nvidia's proprietary tech even though I'd probably do the same in their position.

Good to hear that Gsync appears to be working as advertised, if a little buggy in spots. Great little extra for those on Nvidia.
 
Last edited:
Can GSync (the hardware module) be updated firmware wise?

I'm not sure, plus its not mentioned anywhere it seems. The module does have 768mb of memory on it though, so I would assume so. Plus its linked directly to the gpu so from a transfer perspective it shouldn't be difficult.

Shame Gsync wont work on ATI, but what I would really to try is a 144hz monitor, surely that's a better offering than 60hz any day?

Depending on your system spec and the games you play, you'd probably get a bigger benefit from just bumping up the hz compared to anything else.
 
This is the very reason I lean towards AMD if specs are similar. Not a fan of Nvidia's proprietary tech even though I'd probably do the same in their position.

NVidia have spent a lot of money developing GSync and bringing it to market, the trouble with AMD is they expect everything NVidia have invested heavily in to be given to them for free (GSync/PhysX). AMD GPU's are considerably cheaper than NVidia ones so there's no reason why they can't license those technologies and still be competitive.

Look at Freesync as an example of AMD's hands-off attitude, rather than AMD developing it further and bringing it to market for their customers, they just dangle it like a carrot, stick a troll name on it and then expect monitor manufacturers to take the initiative on making it happen.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a nice feature. Interested to see what its like when the fps are low say 25-40 James.

iirc operating range starts at 30fps, though by james' testing it sounds like it may be closer to 35. Its all good though, if frames are dipping that low you'd start looking to drop the odd setting I presume. It being smooth throughout the frame range James was playing at on crysis 3 fills me full of confidence, that's one game fully maxed out the really starts to slap my cards about :)

BTW for those interested the swift at last note was penciled in for June!! Gsync offerings from other manufacturers are due any time now too, most notably benq with supposedly greatly reduced cost :)
 
@ Neil79, That is because topic is Gsync and nobody has FreeSync as it does not exist.

This is the 1st real user report I have read that was not a pro review site (even then reviews are rare).

Possible early reveal of Freesync:eek:
SLTiHAl.gif
:p:D I don't know why but I stumbled across this and it seemed to fit:o:D

Thanks for posting this info on Gsync:) Lets hope the Monitors (full integrated)will finally be released:cool:
 
To be honest i wasn't that interested in either GSYNC or FreeSync but this sounds promising. It seems to be something you have to experience yourself to really appreciate it.

The lack of display inputs would be a concern though. I notice the the ROG Swift only has displayport also. With my set up that would be quite limiting so i'll probably carry on with my current plans of either the LG 34UM95 or 4K.

Thanks for the post though very helpful :)
 
Nvidia G-Sync Impressions/Owners thread

Hey guys, is anybody else currently using G-Sync ? I'd like to know your impressions.

I bought the G-Sync DIY kit and installed on my Asus VG248QE 144hz monitor. Installation wasn't too difficult, but it did take about an hour and a half at a casual pace.

My initial impressions:

Pros:

-Screen tearing is completely gone now
-Some games seem to take to it very well, like Bioshock Infinite and Far Cry 3
-Seems to be the same amount of 'input lag' (referring to mouse responsiveness in game) as V-Sync off, so pretty much no input lag.
-some games at high fps are incredibly smooth, such as Hard Reset, a very visually intense twitch shooter. (like, smoother than before at a high fps)

Cons:

-Games at already high fps seem to not get much added smoothness
-Some games which I thought would be much smoother at 'lower' fps (I consider that below 60 fps) are only slightly better. Such as Crysis 3, The Secret World and Metro Last Light.
-small % of fps lost in titles because of polling
-high price ~ 200$

Conclusion:

I have gamed with 120hz+ monitors for about 3 years now, and I never use VSync, so I have always dealt with a small amount of tearing, however there was never much to speak of, or I never really noticed it. So this benefit is a bit lost on me, though having zero tearing is nice.

The benefits of G-Sync are supposed to be most noticeable at lower fps (between 30 and 60) but with my current setup it is rare for games to ever dip that low even at Ultra settings, especially because this panel is only 1080, so I believe that benefit is also somewhat lost for me.

In general, every game is now 'smoother' this benefit is one that I do notice, as I consider myself very (unfortunately) perceptive of lag, low and fluctuating fps and microstutter. For example, I can usually clearly tell the difference between 60 and 80 fps. I have even decided to stick to one graphics card after going years with CF/SLI to help eliminate the possiblity of microstutter. And yes, I know, not everybody has the same experice there.

If going to a 120hz monitor is = to 2X better than 60hz then I would say that going from 144hz to 144hz+G-Sync is an overall 20% improvement in overall experience. So, not the amount I was personally hoping for but still enough to be worth it to me.

I would say that unless you only game at 60hz currently, or are very perceptive of the things I mentioned then you had better wait for the 1440p G-Sync panels to arrive because it should be a much greater benefit.

OR if you only have a mid-high end Nvidia graphics card which does not keep most games above 80-90 fps, then it also may be a worthy purchase.

Has anybody else gotten their toes wet with G-Sync or experienced it first hand ? I'd like to know your impressions.

I think a lot of reviwers are coming from 60hz panels so *some* of the benefits they laud are simply from a higher panel hz rate.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2368085&highlight=gsync
 
Can't someone just be sensible and force low FPS by major downsampling or applying crazy AA :p?

Then we can find out how lower frame rates are.

Read further back, James tested crysis 3 with all the bells and whistles as well as bf4 ultra with 200% res scale (essentially a 4k down sample). Both with those settings will drag frames down well below 60 :)
 
Back
Top Bottom