Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 5,267
- Location
- London
Maybe when Nvidia sorts out the 6** problems it'll be a viable alternative to the 7*** series, until then no.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
lol this is gettin out of control here.
Should have done a poll lol
So I should get the 670 no? yes? lol
lol this is gettin out of control here.
Should have done a poll lol
So I should get the 670 no? yes? lol
So Nvidia cards have problems at the moment?
lol this is gettin out of control here.
Should have done a poll lol
So I should get the 670 no? yes? lol
Yes if you want problems and want to become Nvidias beta tester.
There's no smoke without fire, and there's plenty of smoke coming from Nvidia atm.
Stick with the 7950

The 7950 has higher GDDR, memory interface, processing cores
where as;
670 has a higher core clock, memory clock, open gl version
what element makes the difference lol
The 7950 has higher GDDR, memory interface, processing cores
where as;
670 has a higher core clock, memory clock, open gl version
what element makes the difference lol
They all make a difference, but you can only directly compare core count and clock speed between Nvidia cards and AMD separately since they use their resources slightly differently.
I'm not anti AMD, I have an AMD GPU.
I wasn't aware Heaven was the undisputed GPU benchmark? I take it any game an Nvidia GTX680 beats a 7970 must be ignored then?
Thing is, in unbiased reviews the 7970 beats the 680 on every count, when overclocked and when standard.