Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
IF only they had 4k 144hz HDR GSync 1ms, my dream monitor
Reported for spamming the monitor sub-section.
IF only they had 4k 144hz HDR GSync 1ms, my dream monitor
Mate you spammed this in 28 threads the last two days, for multiple manufacturers. Such monitors due April-May 2018 but at £1500-2000 price tag. Enjoy.
(and yes reported you for spam)
Reported for spamming the monitor sub-section.
Were you hacked or drunk?
You won't need windows scaling on a 27" at 2560 x 1440, it's perfectly usable. So only difference is stretching it over a slightly larger screen for the 31.5" model. I've got the C32HG70 with me for testing at the moment (review should be online at TFTcentral next week). Personally I think text is fine on that model, it doesn't look too big or blocky and is still nice and clear. Some ppl may even prefer it depending on their eye sight, and if you sit a bit further back for things like console gaming, movies etc it may be a better option. The added screen size also helps in those areasHe spammed a lot of thread with one line nonsense and it was dealt with AFAIK.
Anyone seen a 32" 1440p vs a 27" 1440p in the flesh, I know I can work out the DPI/PPI and it will be better on the eyes due to Windows poor scaling needed on some things on a 27" 1440p but will it be too blocky like 27" 1080p?
Same question again for 32" 4K, thanks.
I have normal 20/20 or better eyesight (test 2 months ago) but 27" 1440p was hard on some things back when Rog Swift (POS) TN launched so that would be Win 8/8.1 AFAIR and scaling was horrid and MS have not sorted it in Win 10 even though they said it would be better.
I just wonder if 1440p would be blocky on a 32" and how would 4K on a 32" look compared to a 27" 1440p.
I have normal 20/20 or better eyesight (test 2 months ago) but 27" 1440p was hard on some things back when Rog Swift (POS) TN launched so that would be Win 8/8.1 AFAIR and scaling was horrid and MS have not sorted it in Win 10 even though they said it would be better.
I just wonder if 1440p would be blocky on a 32" and how would 4K on a 32" look compared to a 27" 1440p.
It is a massive screen mate, but if you've got the room, then the spectacle of such a large screen is fantastic.Do we know if samsung plan to do a 35" super widescreen version? 49 is too big but love everything else about it (curved, 144hz, freesync, hdr!!)
I have normal 20/20 or better eyesight (test 2 months ago) but 27" 1440p was hard on some things back when Rog Swift (POS) TN launched so that would be Win 8/8.1 AFAIR and scaling was horrid and MS have not sorted it in Win 10 even though they said it would be better.
I just wonder if 1440p would be blocky on a 32" and how would 4K on a 32" look compared to a 27" 1440p.
Do we know if samsung plan to do a 35" super widescreen version? 49 is too big but love everything else about it (curved, 144hz, freesync, hdr!!)
This was my worry too.
I have the CHG70 32’ and after going up from 27’ 1440p I can say that it’s not blocky at all at that res.
Samsung as a panel manufacturer don't manufacturer any SVA panels in the 35" size range, only AU Optronics do, so i would expect it's unlikely for Samsung as a monitor manufacturer to use those panels as they are not from their own company. They do have some other larger panels planned in roadmaps which may emerge at some point in a monitor
40" 16:9 aspect with 1920 x 1080
41" 32:9 aspect with 3840 x 1080
43.4" 29:9 aspect ratio with 3840 x 1200
i expect the 43.4" will be the first to appear but probably not until Q2 2018
How's the monitor? have you tried to run the ufo to see any trailing etc?
I really liked that S27B970D, a lovely looking display! Review of the C32HG70 hopefully completed and online by the end of the week. Got a couple of final things to write up and test but nearly finished