Soldato
WAtching clips like this of TNG just reminds me how much of Picard was, well, just a waste..
WAtching clips like this of TNG just reminds me how much of Picard was, well, just a waste..
I just feel that Picard was, well when you look at the high points in TNG, I just think Picard was a lot of nostalgia and didn't really live up to the hype, or the character, and the whole Data/Picard/Android body thing was well, felt like it cheapened Picard imho..
I just feel that Picard was, well when you look at the high points in TNG, I just think Picard was a lot of nostalgia and didn't really live up to the hype, or the character, and the whole Data/Picard/Android body thing was well, felt like it cheapened Picard imho..
But the people who claim that it's worse than Discovery really need professional help IMO .
A story arc about a giant tardigrade in “Star Trek: Discovery” didn’t infringe a copyright in an unreleased video game that also featured a giant tardigrade, the Second Circuit affirmed Monday.
Many elements of the work that CBS Broadcasting Corp. and Netflix Corp. allegedly infringed covered uncopyrightable scientific facts and ideas about tardigrades, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said.
Kinda wish they lost as it was such a stupid plot of how a bug had access to the universe and helped with a stupid spore drive which span like a joke to go far distances. That should never have been a thing.
Pressure for what though?
I believe the full Kurtzman quote from that recent online-Comicon panel was "The goal is not to promote Star Trek but to use our platform to promote BLM and NAACP".
Alex Kurtzman said:...are critical right now, uh, Black Lives Matter, the NAACP, uh, a lot of our cast speaking to that, Star Trek speaking to it, um, the goal is not really to promote Star Trek, but to promote these organisations and to use our platform to be able to bring greater awareness to these very, very important messages and places.
So, in fact, not quite what you quoted
Though, you're absolutely right to be up in arms. How very dare they use a platform seen worldwide to bring awareness to important issues? That's not what art and media are for at all.
Nor you, hence my direct quote from the Comic-Con panel.
I didn't say I was up in arms
I related what was said and how Emma Watts was publicly making statements about resetting Trek. I really don't care what they do with Trek, as long as it's good, and we've yet to see that from Kurtzman.
What happened to good entertainment, without the patronizing lectures? Good dialogue and characters, without divisive identity politics being shoe-horned in at the expense of story?
Given the severe tanking of viewing figures of all three Kurtzman Trek projects, it seems a lot of people feel that way. Now we've got studio executives talking about resetting Trek right when the newest project launches. That timing is significant.
There's only so many chances Kurtzman gets to fail before he's replaced.
Honestly, CBS should pay some of the better Trek novelists to come in and save them. People like Christopher L Bennett, Stephani Perry, the Dianes (Duane and Carey), Peter David, Judy & Gar Reeves-Steves, John Vornholt, Michael Jan Friedman. People who can actually write Star Trek.