It will probably match the GS4's battery life.
Nexus 5 leaked
- Thread starter dparksinger
- Start date
- Status
It will probably match the GS4's battery life.
Associate
This all got out of hand in a few hours! I guess it's not sage to ask what happened?
Given AMOLED screens eat batteries, it will almost certainly beat the GS4 screen on time.
Pretty much nothing.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 38,372
whats the prediction for time it will be available to order in the UK?
what was the time last year?
around noon on friday? or earlier?
what was the time last year?
around noon on friday? or earlier?
Soldato
Early tomorrow I think is the rumored date.
Man of Honour
8 or 9am on Friday for us I'd say, the announcement won't be made till tomorrow morning their time which is early evening for us.
Soldato
We think it will be announced on the 31st
Was it in one of the deleted posts? I missed them all.
No, you missed nothing! Just some photos of the phone, which showed us nothing new.
Given AMOLED screens eat batteries, it will almost certainly beat the GS4 screen on time.
Are we living in 2011? SAMOLED is pretty efficient now unless your sitting on a white screen all day on full brightness.
3-5hrs screen on time is what the GS4 achieves depending on what your doing.
With 300mAh less juice in the N5 it'll balance the scales. You can keep your benchmarks. edit - proves nothing about the efficiency of SAMOLED.
Last edited:
Why is it worse than the HTC One in that graph?
Yet when you do tests with the screen off (standby, cellular talk time, hotspot time) the rank suddenly reverses.
The 3G web browsing is also good on the GS4.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6914/samsung-galaxy-s-4-review/2
You tell me what causes wifi web browsing to be so bad, when the only major battery drain is the screen.
Last edited:
Did they use the exact same browser? S4 is based on chrome, the other on AOSP. Software optimization makes a huge difference.
care to share why the Xperia Z did so miserably with an LCD screen?
How does a web browsing benchmark go on to dictate how good battery life is in all purpose general use? It doesn't.
Like I said it will probably average 3-5hrs screen on time just like the GS4.
Just goes to show how fickle that benchmark is - and benchmarks in general.
care to share why the Xperia Z did so miserably with an LCD screen?
How does a web browsing benchmark go on to dictate how good battery life is in all purpose general use? It doesn't.
Like I said it will probably average 3-5hrs screen on time just like the GS4.
Just goes to show how fickle that benchmark is - and benchmarks in general.
Skype.
Did they use the exact same browser? S4 is based on chrome, the other on AOSP. Software optimization makes a huge difference.
care to share why the Xperia Z did so miserably with an LCD screen?
How does a web browsing benchmark go on to dictate how good battery life is in all purpose general use? It doesn't.
Like I said it will probably average 3-5hrs screen on time just like the GS4.
Just goes to show how fickle that benchmark is - and benchmarks in general.
Do gsmarena do all battery life tests at the same brightness? Anandtech do them at 200 nits.
Web browsing tests show us how efficient a screen is. That's what I was talking about. Ultimately the screen is very important for a lot of usage.
Last edited:
Soldato
I was always surprised how the Z1 did so badly, its not just GSMarean it sucked everywhere for basically the same specs as the G2, I think its down to very bad software and their wired crappy screen tech they are trying to push everywhere.
Why is the Nexus 4 behind the S3 with a bigger screen yet the same battery size?
My point is - benchmarks are just a guide and in reality, they don't provide concrete evidence.
- Status