No they are not, eScooters are not pedal bikes, for an ebike to be classified as a bicycle and not a moped it requires pedals and the electrical assistance can only be operated by pedalling the bike, if it is throttle controlled it is a moped, if the electrical assistance is above 15.5mph it is a moped, if it has no pedals, it is a moped, if its over 250w it is a moped. An escooter is legally classified as a motor vehicle currently, and requires the appropriate legislation for operation in the UK (mot, insurance etc) but that could change in the future.
It shouldn't be equal because the modes of transport are not equal. Should a bus be treated the same as a car? Why does a lorry require more regulation than a moped? The sole reason why regulation/legislation isn't as strict on bicycles is because the law assumes you won't put yourself in danger as your not protected as you would be in a metal box. Some people don't care about themselves or anyone else and no amount of legislation is going to change that. Would they be held accountable for their actions, I'd say no more than they are now, because there's no one to enforce it.
The only thing that would happen should any of this come into effect, is a significant reduction in the number of people cycling for leasure, and ultimately lead to a great increase in obesity and other illnesses related to poor fitness. Which would cost more in the long term. Regulation/Legislation that cannot or is too hard to be enforced, or millions of more medical issues clogging up our NHS even more. The only law I would like to see come in is the requirement for bicycle helmets to be worn, even then in most situations where a helmet was worn and the crash/accident was significant, the helmet would have made no difference to the outcome. Which circles back to the safety aspect of cycling on roads, and why more segregated cycle lanes are absolutely required and if implimented well could actually speed up traffic by allowing higher speed limits as motor vehicles would no longer be a risk to people cycling on a cycle lane.
1. I said the ‘specs’ of the eScooters and eBikes are the same, i.e. 250w/15.5mph limit, and you highlight the deftness of the logic being applied.. literally the only difference is one you gently turn the pedals to unleash 250w/15.mph of assistance, the other you press a thumb throttle, yet legally they are treated so differently it’s laughable.. I have 2 eScooters in the house, bought well before the law was clarified, and ridden a fair few times, and believe me, the fact they are not being treated in all regards as being interchangeable with an eBike is ridiculous, it’s a great alternative.. My opinion of why they’ve been so harshly treated is it’s like a mass of causal (otherwise potential) cyclists suddenly come along which just then highlights the problems with cycling, more people cycling on pavements, more jumping red lights, more being irresponsible, and that is a problem..
2. I never suggested treating everyone to the same rigour.. but being identifiable on a bike and policing the obvious is no where near the level of a car or moped, I didn’t say you should have a licence on a cycle, nor even inusrance, or MOT or the myriad of other things…
3. I agree on the policing, that needs sorting.. but it’s no excuse, there is no point changing laws and defining this hierachy of vulnerability and only policing one sliver of it.
4. The obesity argument is hypothetical and probably the weakest, if eScooters where legal and everyone was pushed more towards cycles and scooters we’d have far less road deaths from cars, less pollution in cities, etc, etc, yet they clearly don’t want people on greener/cleaner and ultimately healthier for everyone transport..
BTW, I don’t think registration of bikes is a good idea , or registration of eScooters for the same reason, it’s better policing we need, maybe employ cheap local pcso’s to help the community with low level stuff including this, but if all we can do is remote policing then maybe registration for all is fair.