yet there is a fun law of drunk in charge of a pedal cycleNo they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included
yet there is a fun law of drunk in charge of a pedal cycleNo they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included
yet there is a fun law of drunk in charge of a pedal cycle
No they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included
Highway Code said:This section should be read by all drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders.
Rule 124 said:Locally set speed limits may apply, for example
Presumably, that's because when the Highway Code was first produced the lowest speed limit in common use was 30 mph and no one thought pedal-powered bicycles would exceed that speed for more than a few moments.No they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included
My thoughts as a car driver, biker and cyclist :-
1) Motorised/Powered vehicles like e-bikes and e-scooters (if ever made road legal) should be registered and insured. Plus there should be strict speed/power limits on them. If they're exceeded they should be subject to the same regulations, licensing as cars and motorbikes.
2) Police need to actually make an effort to crack down and prosecute those caught breaking the law by riding on pavements (whether pedal or e-bikes) or flouting speed/power retrictions.
3) Pedal bikes shouldn't be subject to the same regulations/restrictions as electrically powered vehicles like ebikes, escooters, etc.
To my mind point 2 is the biggest problem. I've never seen police make any effort to stop those who are clearly breaking the law by riding on pavements. Likewise I've never seen anyone riding an e-scooter on the road, which is currently illegal, stopped by the police. Plus I've been overtaken at 30-40mph by pedal ebikes which are clearly unrestricted.
Those 10 cyclists can get themselves down the gym and maintain their fitness in a safe environment.Cool. Petition for those 10 cyclists to be forced to cycle single file taking up 20m+ of the road and still riding in the safe area in the road. You will never be able to get past them safely then...
Perhaps if you thought about why they do it instead of thinking that they want attention (I mean come on) then you might have realised why its preferable when cyclists are in a group.
The main thing that causes traffic is...cars.
They're not.I believe they are, it's just that the Police won't prosecute a cyclist who momentarily exceeds a speed limit while going down a hill because that would be pointless and look ridiculous. The posted speed limit applies to all vehicles driving down that road (unless there is a lower maximum speed limit set for particular vehicles, like trucks/caravans/etc on motorways). It doesn't matter if they are propelled by an internal combustion engine, electric motor, human peddle power or a horse. After all, cyclists still have to obey the direction of traffic on one-way streets and stop at red traffic lights etc so why would they be exempt from the posted speed limit? I suspect Grant Shapps is talking out of his arse as usual.
They're not.
"Speed limits listed in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and also Rule 124 of the Highway Code relate to motor vehicles and not to bicycles."
You can't be done for speeding on a bicycle, but they can do you for "cycling furiously"
Yeah saw that, it's wrong. It's bylaw based speed limits that apply.Interesting. But see this post by Quartz:
Number plates for cyclists...
No they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included yet there is a fun law of drunk in charge of a pedal cycle :Dforums.overclockers.co.uk
just because cyclists don't have actual speed laws doesn't mean they can't be arrested of breaking them, there's different laws for cycling dangerously that apply"It is, however, possible for local bylaws to impose speed limits on cyclists. For example, on Hampstead Heath in London there is an 8mph speed limit for cyclists, and in Richmond Park the speed limit of 20 miles per hour for vehicles also applies to cyclists."
Already covered under "cycling furiously".just ban cyclists, too much competition for boris bike/scooters and some tory donor ain't making enough monies
just because cyclists don't have actual speed laws doesn't mean they can't be arrested of breaking them, there's different laws for cycling dangerously that apply
Horses should get license plates too, see how the toffs like it, they also should pick up the crap they leave behind, sick off seeing massive mountains of poo in cycle lanes
no it's "wanton and dangerous cycling" or something like that if someone gets injuredAlready covered under "cycling furiously".
Pretty sure that can only be applied if someone has been injured though.
Is that correct? National speed limits are set for different types of vehicles, but local speed limits can also apply and appear to apply to all road vehicles.
A bicycle is not classed as a motor vehicle so these speed limits do not apply.It shall not be lawful for a person to drive a motor vehicle of any class on a road at a speed greater than the speed specified in Schedule 6 to this Act as the maximum speed in relation to a vehicle of that class.
"Wanton and furious cycling" actually. But yes I thought it was a thing about the injury bit so can't be used to just do a cyclist for speeding unless they hurt someone.no it's "wanton and dangerous cycling" or something like that if someone gets injured
Yet the realiSorry but this is just nonsense... a cyclist on a pushbike is still more than capable of killing a pedestrian in a collision if a bit of "bad luck" joins in, so to try and act like "but, but, it's a cyclist, what harm can they do?" is just laughable.
So will the government be providing every cyclist with a GPS cycling computer/speedo and where do they expect people to locate a licence plate on a bike? Personally, if this idiocy becomes law I'm just going to ignore it and carry on cycling as usual. **** 'em!
A bicycle is not classed as a motor vehicle so these speed limits do not apply.
Yeah saw that, it's wrong. It's bylaw based speed limits that apply.