Was it an incredible coincidence? Why did the Police omit other deaths from their chart giving the false impression that Letby was present at all neonatal deaths?
The police chart showed that she was always on the neonatal ward at the time of the deaths she was accused of causing. She wasn't accused of causing the other deaths, so there was no 'false impression.' I don't recall the police claiming she was present for
all neonatal deaths on the ward.
Incidentally, police believe she was guilty of even more deaths than she'd been accused of, including the deaths of babies at another hospital.
Was Letby's shift pattern the same as other nurses?
How is that relevant?
In an organisation the size of the NHS, what number of nurses would be expected to show the same pattern of deaths?
I don't know, how about you find out yourself and see if what you have found exonerates her?
We do know that the hospital was slow to suspect Letby, reluctant to point the finger at her, and ruled out multiple possibilities before eventually concluding she might be responsible. They even punished consultants who raised suspicions, requiring them to write letters of apology. But eventually, the evidence became too great to ignore. The insulin poisonings were a smoking gun. Letby could not pretend these deaths were accidental.
We also know that she falsified medical records to hide what she was doing.
I dunno, there is a lot of information not available to us, and I don't know why the defence apparently failed to call expert testimony available to them, but the information available in the public domain stinks.
LOL.
No, they don't. The same note that is this supposed "confession" says "I've done nothing wrong" and "I don't know why they died". It seems more like the jottings of someone in extreme mental distress than anything that points to her as a killer.
'I am evil.' 'I did this.' 'I killed them on purpose.'