I just don't understand the motive, i can only think the person who did it got a kick out of inflicting misery on the families
Clearly a psychopath.
I just don't understand the motive, i can only think the person who did it got a kick out of inflicting misery on the families
Why was she allowed to continue working?
This gets worse day by day
Lucy Letby trial - latest: Nurse 'adamant' she's done nothing to harm any of the babies in the case as defence begins
Latest updates on day four of the Lucy Letby trial, with the prosecution showing the court handwritten "confessions" from the nurse in which she allegedly admitted she was "evil", and the defence saying the hospital was "well out of its depth". Letby denies all charges.news.sky.com
Sounds like the consultants knew something was off and involved the police.Why was she allowed to continue working?
This gets worse day by day
Lucy Letby trial - latest: Nurse 'adamant' she's done nothing to harm any of the babies in the case as defence begins
Latest updates on day four of the Lucy Letby trial, with the prosecution showing the court handwritten "confessions" from the nurse in which she allegedly admitted she was "evil", and the defence saying the hospital was "well out of its depth". Letby denies all charges.news.sky.com
God knows but I remember with Beverley Allit it was suspected Munchausen syndrome by proxy - so she enjoyed jumping into the middle of a family tragedy (that she'd caused obviously) for the attention she'd receive as she supported the family.I just cannot fathom why anyone could even consider deliberately killing a baby.
Records have to be looked into and see if there’s a person each time an incident happened. This what happened with Allitt
Doctor interrupted nurse Lucy Letby’s attempt to kill newborn baby, court told
Consultant had started to link Letby to unexplained deaths and rushed to help infant, jury hearswww.theguardian.com
A “cold-blooded” nurse was trying to kill a 98-minute-old baby when she was interrupted by a doctor who had started to link her to unexplained deaths, a court heard.
Lucy Letby, 32, was standing over the incubator of a newborn girl whose oxygen levels had fallen “dangerously” low when a colleague walked in, a jury was told.
Ravi Jayaram, a paediatric consultant, had been “uncomfortable” that Letby was alone with the 12-week premature baby because he had “started to notice a coincidence between unexplained deaths, serious collapses and the presence of Lucy Letby”, the trial at Manchester crown court heard.
Jayaram rushed to help the infant and found that her chest was not moving and her breathing tube had been dislodged, it was alleged.
Letby was “making no effort to help” the baby and had not called for assistance, jurors were told, while an alarm connected to the infant appeared to have been silenced.
Jayaram was “troubled” because Letby was the only person in the room, the court heard. He did not make a contemporaneous note of his suspicions or about the alarm failing to activate, the trial before judge Sir James Goss was told.
The baby, who can only be named as Baby K, died three days later after another incident when Letby was at her side.
Really strange, I do the same day job can can't envisage a situation where that wouldn't be an immediate absolute poop storm.
It's unreal. Staggering incompetence and disregard of safeguarding procedures.
The thing I'm finding hard is they clearly had suspicions and moved who they thought the likely perpetrator was off night shifts on day shifts and the deaths continued. I find it amazing that this was allowed to happen and wonder if they were guided by the police in an attempt to more clearly identify the perpetrator. Ethically though I find that hard to tally, how could you continue to put babies at risk knowing you had a likely murderer on the unit?
I haven’t seen coverage on the case so maybe there is some information I am missing. Your post has the luxury of hindsight, which is that you know that those deaths were malice and not incompetence, and that is something they may not have known at the time.The thing I'm finding hard is they clearly had suspicions and moved Letby, who they thought the likely perpetrator was, off night shifts on day shifts and the deaths continued. I find it amazing that this was allowed to happen and wonder if they were guided by the police in an attempt to more clearly identify the perpetrator perhaps? Ethically though I find that hard to tally, how could you continue to put babies at risk knowing you had a likely murderer on the unit?
Absolutely but I also have worked on neonatal units for many years and find the whole situation very strange. I suspect the must have been a huge mental barrier to suspecting a colleague could be doing harm intentionally.I haven’t seen coverage on the case so maybe there is some information I am missing. Your post has the luxury of hindsight, which is that you know that those deaths were malice and not incompetence, and that is something they may not have known at the time.