Nurse arrested for murdering babies

I just want a physicist's explanation as to why she did this!? :(:(:(

Because she's "Evil" simply isn't good enough for me

I think one of the notes they found that she wrote said she considered herself a failure because she couldn't have a husband and children. She is very likely has a personality dissorder with no human empathy and she looks as people as either amazing or beyond contempt, she has no differing opinion on how she views people. This includes herself, so in her mind she is beyond contempt as she doesn't have the husband and children other women have. She needs to find ways to make her sense of self feel better for this loss of self esteem. She is very jealous of other women who have a partner and children. She gets a sadistic thrill out of taking these children from their mothers. She feels powerful that she can take these children away from their parents and the parents feel somewhat how she feels inside. This is all about how she feels internally.

She even stalked the parents on facebook, after murdering their babies. She even sent a sympathy card to one of the parents and took a photo of the card as a trophy. She gets a thrill that she can control and affect these parents lives. Because feeling powerful means that she is in a sense an amazing all powerful person who can destroy others. This perversely makes her feel a sense of self esteem. At a guess it's mainly the women she enjoys inflicting sadistic pain on because she is jealous of them. I'd have a guess that she maybe picked women she judged to be beyond contempt. Perhaps in her mind she justified what she did as the women not deserving the baby and partner. It would be interesting to know if she killed babies of single mothers or only mothers who had a birthing partner she was jealous of.
 
Last edited:
One thing that surprises me, especially after the hospital suffered a spate of baby deaths is that more CCTV wasn't installed. Could have caught her in the act then.

There was certainly CCTV in that unit when my girls were born there (2005 and 2008), but its impossible to cover everywhere and privacy grounds would prevent that if you tried. I remember it covered the entry/exit and obvious public areas like the nurse station, but never saw the ICU where the offences apparently took place.
 
Last edited:
Have your babies at home, and care for your elderly parents at home, if humanly possible. The NHS is broken broken beyond the current will of its managers.

Even below average boarding kennels have more empathy for their charges than many so called "care homes". Putting your parents in some is akin to sending them to a cruel and frightening, yet eye wateringly expensive death. Less than a year at home with their family is worth six years in many such places.

You should probably stop voting Tory then...
 
A doctor did catch her in the act! He did nothing.
This is false, he didn't catch her dislodging the breathing tube and she claims she was in the process of assisting the baby. The fact that the doctor did nothing if he believed he witnessed an attempted murder raises some big questions. He already had suspicions so could part of his recollection be confirmation bias? Is it possible he made parts of it up because he is convinced she is guilty but they have no evidence?
 
Last edited:
This is false, he didn't catch her dislodging the breathing tube and she claims she was in the process of assisting the baby. The fact that the doctor did nothing if he believed he witnessed an attempted murder raises some big questions. He already had suspicions so could part of his recollection be confirmation bias? Is it possible he made parts of it up because he is convinced she is guilty but they have no evidence?

Just going to post this again...

Lucy Letby, 32, was standing over the incubator of a newborn girl whose oxygen levels had fallen “dangerously” low when a colleague walked in, a jury was told.


Ravi Jayaram, a paediatric consultant, had been “uncomfortable” that Letby was alone with the 12-week premature baby because he had “started to notice a coincidence between unexplained deaths, serious collapses and the presence of Lucy Letby”, the trial at Manchester crown court heard.

Jayaram rushed to help the infant and found that her chest was not moving and her breathing tube had been dislodged, it was alleged.

Letby was “making no effort to help” the baby and had not called for assistance, jurors were told, while an alarm connected to the infant appeared to have been silenced.

Jayaram was “troubled” because Letby was the only person in the room, the court heard. He did not make a contemporaneous note of his suspicions or about the alarm failing to activate, the trial before judge Sir James Goss was told.

The baby, who can only be named as Baby K, died three days later after another incident when Letby was at her side.
 
Just going to post this again...

Lucy Letby, 32, was standing over the incubator of a newborn girl whose oxygen levels had fallen “dangerously” low when a colleague walked in, a jury was told.


Ravi Jayaram, a paediatric consultant, had been “uncomfortable” that Letby was alone with the 12-week premature baby because he had “started to notice a coincidence between unexplained deaths, serious collapses and the presence of Lucy Letby”, the trial at Manchester crown court heard.

Jayaram rushed to help the infant and found that her chest was not moving and her breathing tube had been dislodged, it was alleged.

Letby was “making no effort to help” the baby and had not called for assistance, jurors were told, while an alarm connected to the infant appeared to have been silenced.

Jayaram was “troubled” because Letby was the only person in the room, the court heard. He did not make a contemporaneous note of his suspicions or about the alarm failing to activate, the trial before judge Sir James Goss was told.

The baby, who can only be named as Baby K, died three days later after another incident when Letby was at her side.
Already seen it, simply makes no sense why he did nothing if he already had prior suspicions and was so convinced he had witnessed an attempted murder. Calling this witness unreliable seems generous. I do think she probably did it, but not beyond all reasonable doubt. Either way her life is completely ruined now which is why people charged with crimes need to be anonymous until convicted.
 
Last edited:
To paraphrase Sheriff J. W. Pepper, "What are you, some kind of doomsday machine girl?"

If I were her defence barrister I'd not have any great hopes of an acquittal at this stage of the trial, no matter how many pep talks I'd given myself or my client... in fact "lost cause" would be in my mind.
 
She's pretty hot.

This is tragic.
It's the space between these sentences which I enjoyed the most, a void which rob and similar gladly flung themselves in to and to which, humble brag on your behalf, was your intention I assume.

9/10 would dilemma again, 10/10 will help further my posting positions.
 
Last edited:
While i would only say she's above average looking, she looks the furthest away from being a psychopathic serial killer that I could possibly imagine and I'll admit it broke my brain a little. I can't fathom that someone who looks like a sweet, kind, english rose type could do any of this.

If you think about some of the most incredibly disturbing and abhorrent things that can happen to a child and how that will massively affect their development, I am not surprised by some of the most incredibly evil acts people commit. This is absolutely not an excuse but merely a possible explanation for their behaviour. If we can identify the origins of why people behave in certain ways, we are then in a better position to try and prevent these types of attacks from happening in the future.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom