• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA 4000 Series

For you to not use it until Xmas 2025? :p

Sounds about right, but FOMO too strong.
Is Frame Gen worth using? I just got myself a 4070ti Super,and I keep hearing mixed opinions about it
Yes I think it's worth using, just not for ultra competitive shooters/games. Where any added latency is detrimental to your performance.

If you're after the best visual experience then use quality preset.
 
Just get a 7900XT if VRAM is a concern, can regularly find deals on these at £550 and they are 20% faster than a 4070s in raster.

Vram is a concern but I went with the 4070s as I want the option of ray tracing and amd can't provide that for me. I don't plan on moving to 4k res so I'm hoping I'll be ok at 1440p. Feels ******* awful worrying about a new gpu's vram before even getting it but the price jump to the 4070 ti super is ridiculous considering it only has 5-10% gains. Yes it has the vram headroom but I'd need the vram headroom and huge jumps in performance to justify that mental price.
 
Vram is a concern but I went with the 4070s as I want the option of ray tracing and amd can't provide that for me. I don't plan on moving to 4k res so I'm hoping I'll be ok at 1440p. Feels ******* awful worrying about a new gpu's vram before even getting it but the price jump to the 4070 ti super is ridiculous considering it only has 5-10% gains. Yes it has the vram headroom but I'd need the vram headroom and huge jumps in performance to justify that mental price.
The old AMD can't do RT is a common misconception and while certainly favours Nvidia when looking at the same tier of cards the 7900XT is 1.5 tiers higher than the 4070S so over a spread of games in RT there isn't actually much in it. Once VRAM does run out though the 4070S falls quite a way behind as shown in 4k so I don't expect the 4070S will age as well and we may find it has fallen behind even at 1440p in a year or two.

NVIDIA-Ge-Force-RTX-4070-Super-Founders-Edition-Review-Ray-Tracing-Tech-Power-Up.jpg
NVIDIA-Ge-Force-RTX-4070-Super-Founders-Edition-Review-Ray-Tracing-Tech-Power-Up-1.jpg
 
The old AMD can't do RT is a common misconception and while certainly favours Nvidia when looking at the same tier of cards the 7900XT is 1.5 tiers higher than the 4070S so over a spread of games in RT there isn't actually much in it. Once VRAM does run out though the 4070S falls quite a way behind as shown in 4k so I don't expect the 4070S will age as well and we may find it has fallen behind even at 1440p in a year or two.

NVIDIA-Ge-Force-RTX-4070-Super-Founders-Edition-Review-Ray-Tracing-Tech-Power-Up.jpg
NVIDIA-Ge-Force-RTX-4070-Super-Founders-Edition-Review-Ray-Tracing-Tech-Power-Up-1.jpg

I can see the gains over the 4070s in something like a 4080. But with a 4070 ti super being so close to the 4070s in actual performance surely the extra vram headroom won't make a difference 3 or 4 years down the line when they're both struggling more? Like the same way a 3060 is struggling now. If the 3060 had 16gb of vram it would still be struggling as it just doesn't have the juice.
 
surely the extra vram headroom won't make a difference 3 or 4 years down the line when they're both struggling more?
If it's making a difference now then yes, of course it could.

It's Nvidia being stingy with VRAM that's causing these issues. They want people to pay and regardless of whether you or I agree with that, if you want more video memory then they make you pay for it.

In your position, I'd be inclined to return the 12GB card and get an AMD alternative with more VRAM. As stated above, a lot of people think that AMD cards cannot do RT at all when this is patently untrue.
 
If it's making a difference now then yes, of course it could.

It's Nvidia being stingy with VRAM that's causing these issues. They want people to pay and regardless of whether you or I agree with that, if you want more video memory then they make you pay for it.

In your position, I'd be inclined to return the 12GB card and get an AMD alternative with more VRAM. As stated above, a lot of people think that AMD cards cannot do RT at all when this is patently untrue.

Yep might be worth considering. My biggest concern is upscacling. I have a ps5 and fsr is used for the majority of games on there. Looks horrible. Not sure i want to be stuck with fsr for the next few years when dlss looks notieably better.
 
Yep might be worth considering. My biggest concern is upscacling. I have a ps5 and fsr is used for the majority of games on there. Looks horrible. Not sure i want to be stuck with fsr for the next few years when dlss looks notieably better.
FSR3 is way better than FSR2, go check out some videos, it's infinitely better than it was. AMD's FG is also very acceptable now.

The version of it used on the PS will be game dependant, but any game using FSR3 should look good.
 
Yep might be worth considering. My biggest concern is upscacling. I have a ps5 and fsr is used for the majority of games on there. Looks horrible. Not sure i want to be stuck with fsr for the next few years when dlss looks notieably better.
The old adage “you can’t have everything on the cheap” applies here. If you want DLSS and VRAM and grunt then get a 4090.
 
Last edited:
FSR3 is way better than FSR2, go check out some videos, it's infinitely better than it was. AMD's FG is also very acceptable now.

The version of it used on the PS will be game dependant, but any game using FSR3 should look good.

To be fair it looks like you put your money where your mouth is in terms of the 4080. No vram concerns and the best upscaler. Even fsr3 looked rough on ps5 but maybe that's just because of super low internal resolution.
 
Reading the GPU hierarchy it looks as though a 4070 is good for 4k 60 fps. Do we think the 5070 will maintain that considering games will invariably become more demanding in that time frame?
 
To be fair it looks like you put your money where your mouth is in terms of the 4080. No vram concerns and the best upscaler. Even fsr3 looked rough on ps5 but maybe that's just because of super low internal resolution.
Well that's just it, it was unexpected cash otherwise I'd perhaps still be running the 3080. That said, the best value appears to be the 4090. Don't get me wrong, I do like this card a lot, powerful yet also efficient. But I think 959 quid was a LOT of cash for it.

I think you might be right on the PS3, but a PC would give you more control over the internal resolution. I really would check out how FSR3 is running on PCs though, it's come on in leaps and bounds compared to when it was first introduced.
 
Back
Top Bottom