Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
you are technically overclocking the card though by setting the memory to +750 , as stock it will downclock the memory when not needed to save power925mv 2.7ghz +750mem pretty much stock for less power
ive never seen the memory change as long as its in its performance state i did the same thing on the 3080 for past 2 years.you are technically overclocking the card though by setting the memory to +750 , as stock it will downclock the memory when not needed to save power
It will 100% downclock the memory in performance state when it doesn't need all the bandwidth as can be seen in the pic below where memory is at half its normal bandwidth due to low load , clock also very low ... this is all stock . FF7 its stupidly low .
It will 100% downclock the memory in performance state when it doesn't need all the bandwidth as can be seen in the pic below where memory is at half its normal bandwidth due to low load , clock also very low ... this is all stock . FF7 its stupidly low .
I would be interested in seeing comparisons saving power via an undervolt vs stock at the same fps for sure
I mentioned to another member yesterday who got a 4090 and currently has a 750w PSU that under load in most games it uses about 550-600w from the wall ... you can get away with it if careful with overclocks etc
Nice so a 45w saving but it has dropped 3 boost bins to achieve that but not a drastic reduction in temp as it was not far off as stock , none the less a nice result
quick and dirty with only just putting gpu in
it hasnt dropped them like i said card only just went in and that must have been what i set it to. so was just quick and dirtyNice so a 45w saving but it has dropped 3 boost bins to achieve that but not a drastic reduction in temp as it was not far off as stock , none the less a nice result
here you goNice so a 45w saving but it has dropped 3 boost bins to achieve that but not a drastic reduction in temp as it was not far off as stock , none the less a nice result
<1% chance. AMD has nothing to compete with, Intel is a decade away from any kind of relevance and inflation is still running rampant. Imo the only price change will be an increase, for the 4090, but the 4080 seems priced "right" from Nvidia's perspective and according to the market. The $1200 price got well established with the 2080 Ti and then the 3080 Ti. The MSRP for 3080 was simply fake and not just due to miners. I guess we'll know more once we can see the next financial report.
All what's really happened is the 'covid supply restrictions' proved that people are stupid and will spend excessive amounts on gpu's... Nvidia (and AMD followed suit as many of us predicted) saw this, bumped the prices up this generation and are basically milking us for all we're worth.
THat's a key point. Times are different now. Historically NV don't drop their prices but we're going through economic conditions not seen for a long time. Prices have increased massively at a bad time. If supply exceeds demand, lower profit per unit will be better than none, if AMD & NV can't sell what they're making.
You know the 4080 is bad when none of the 3080 10GB users have upgraded, guess they must be waiting for the 4070 10GB.
