• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards

Jacky60 said:
I've used over 10GB in 4K with 16x SSAA so I'd say yes we do.
Click to expand...

When your effective resolution being rendered is 61440x34560 I'm not surprised (if that was native it use 68gb of Vram just for the frame buffer before anything else was loaded) what are you playing with that res and AA lol
 
humbug said:
Time Spy does scale better than games, its almost 1:1, in reality the scaling in game is likely to be less.
Click to expand...


I will still wait.
Then sort out a power supply with the right connections :D

For me to pay over £800 it has to be 100% faster then my old Titan X pascal in games.
 
You can't get higher scaling than you have GPU, if that's what that shows there is something wrong with it ^^^
Its 132 vs 146, that's not much and no where near 1:1
Greebo said:
Its only 17.6%. So an even tighter squeeze. Too tight for a 3080ti. Maybe enough space for a 3080 super though which is slightly faster (5%) and has 16 or 20Gb memory.
Click to expand...

Oh wait a minute, how did you arrive at that?

2080TI: 6350
3080: 8500
3090: 10000

8500 Divided by 6350 = 1.338 (+34%)
10000 Divided 6350 = 1.574 (+57%)
 
KillBoY_UK said:
When your effective resolution being rendered is 61440x34560 I'm not surprised (if that was native it use 68gb of Vram just for the frame buffer before anything else was loaded) what are you playing with that res and AA lol
Click to expand...
It was Arma 3 so an old game but it looked incredible tbh. Obviously that was a one off as it's so CPU limited I could max out the eye candy at 4K.
 
five8five said:
Things move fast in this thread. It's not like the tumbleweed AMD thread :p
Click to expand...

fetchimage
 
T
humbug said:
You can't get higher scaling than you have GPU, if that's what that shows there is something wrong with it ^^^
Its 132 vs 146, that's not much and no where near 1:1


Oh wait a minute, how did you arrive at that?

2080TI: 6350
3080: 8500
3090: 10000

8500 Divided by 6350 = 1.338 (+34%)
10000 Divided 6350 = 1.574 (+57%)
Click to expand...

10000 divided by 8500 = 1.176 (+17.6%) the gap between the 3080 and the 3090.

So if the 3080ti comes out and then its not much of a gap to squeeze into.

Unless its closer to 3090 in price, then it cant be 10% faster than a 3080 otherwise nobody will buy the 3090 which would only be 7% faster than the 3080ti.

If its only 5% faster than the 3080 then there is a 12% gap to the 3090 but people would only buy the 3080ti at 5% faster if it came with more memory as well otherwise whats the point.

So it doesnt leave much of a gap unless they change the pricing when the super or ti comes out.

But I will be happy with with a 34% performance increase of the 3080 over the 2080ti so long as the memory thing doesnt become an issue.
 
five8five said:
Waiting for a leak........
Click to expand...

I just wish their release wasn't an extra month later. I have a good feeling for their rasterisation performance but I feel like it's gonna be a Navi vs Turing repeat. AMD has good value but lacking in features/niche performance (RT etc) while the other side charges an arm and a leg for the extra goodies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom