Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
If we added up the IQ points of all the people who joined the forum after the 3080 launch we'd still be short of triple figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Last time I counted from the spreadsheet, OCUK had in excess of 9,100 outstanding 3080 pre-orders. Obviously the 3070 launch and the RDNA2 announcement have happened since then, so I expect lots of cancellations for 3080 cards, but with OCUK having only shipped 559 cards (as of the 26th Oct) they stand to loose a lot of money they are currently sat on if people realise what is going on and start cancelling in droves. If OCUK were to do what almost every other retailer do, and take payment on fulfilment, I wouldn't have such a big problem with their practices, but to be sat on millions of pounds of customer money with no realistic ETA AND continuing to take more pre-orders.... Well, it's dishonest at best and a terrible business practice, but the only thing I can do as an individual is speak with my wallet and shop elsewhere, which is exactly what I'm doing.
Sharing a member of staff's name, and essentially a private conversationOCUK moderators seem to be clearing up all traces of them ever being honest with us! There was even an apology in there somewhere.
Lots of deleted posts in the last few pages
Can we get an explanation or some comments from whomever is deleting things?
Yes quite.Censorship of an actual OCUK email communication with a costumer? Are you for real??!!!
It's not really an official communicationAppropriate to who? Not OC, for sure. But an official communication that seems to contradict everything we have been told is sure as **** appropriate to many here....
Not reallySoooo...if the email is reposted without the staff member name, then we're all good?
What happens on Social Media sites isn't a forum moderation problemlooks like someone put a copy of the email on ocuks last twitter post if anyone wants it
It said the TRUTH, and the truth hurts the most!Yikes, looks like the last few pages have been hit with a pressure washer
What was wrong with posting the email out of interest? It didn't say confidential anywhere.
OCUK moderators seem to be clearing up all traces of them ever being honest with us! There was even an apology in there somewhere.
Lots of deleted posts in the last few pages
Can we get an explanation or some comments from whomever is deleting things?
If we added up all of the people that will now shop elsewhere in future i'm sure we're well past triple digitsIf we added up the IQ points of all the people who joined the forum after the 3080 launch we'd still be short of triple figures![]()
![]()
it named a staff member was the reason given. we havn't been told if it can be reposted with names removed or not though. I suspect it was removed for other reasons. Probably that it offered some transparency which is totally against OC policies... apparentlyYikes, looks like the last few pages have been hit with a pressure washer
What was wrong with posting the email out of interest? It didn't say confidential anywhere.
Sharing a member of staff's name, and essentially a private conversation
Yes quite.
It's not really an official communication
Not really
What happens on Social Media sites isn't a forum moderation problem
No transparency for you! Only opaque!it named a staff member was the reason given. we havn't been told if it can be reposted with names removed or not though. I suspect it was removed for other reasons. Probably that it offered some transparency which is totally against OC policies... apparently![]()
![]()
mines open... had a lovely Chinese last week.
Sharing a member of staff's name, and essentially a private conversation
Yes quite.
It's not really an official communication
Not really
What happens on Social Media sites isn't a forum moderation problem
opaque is being generousNo transparency for you! Only opaque!![]()
sooo. that's why yours closed lolIf you learn how to make them yourself (and it's not difficult) then you will never eat takeaway again. It's quick and much better tasting, and you know what has gone into it too!
id agree. there was nothing in that email that could be considered private. Nothing that the rep wouldn't have said to anybody else. They offered gibbos name which isn't great but thats easily removed.What planet are you on? How an email from OCUK staff member to an costumer query is private and confidential? Are you that blind, uninformed, naïve, or all three?
Are you that blind, uninformed, naïve, or all three?