Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Sorry I'm late...
Brought some for everyone
I think you're gonna skip and a shovel...
I think those benches are BS. Latest benchmarks show GTX 280 SLi struggling to get 120FPS at 1680x1050 with 4AA on Farcry 2, so how does this GTC 295 manage to get 150FPS at 2560x1600 with 4AA?
And those PhysX benchmarks just make it even worse, there's no point at all in including them. The people who know and understand what PhysX is, and to who that graph will count for, aren't stupid enough to fall for what they're obviously doing.
I dunno where you have seen that but it says it gets around 50-55 fps at top rez in farcry 2
Eh, me too, that's why I ninja edited , too early for me to be complaining about benchmarks, I see stuff that's not there. Musta been looking at dead space for some reason.
whats the point of physix graph as ati does not support it ? correct me if im wrong.
4870x2 is out for 4 months or more ? of course it will be faster. but i guess it is not a concern as ati had all those months to focus on future product to come.
now its nvidia who is catching up
Your right! It does, lol
Will the downclocked budget version resemble a betamax
Early days but that card will probably have staggering performance.
What were those problems? Choking due to lack of memory or something?wonder if it will have the problems the 9800gx2 has above 1920x1200
Love that one, wheres the DX 10.1 benchmarks? or ATI stream benchmarks?