In that case you should look at my arguments numbered 2 and 3.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA Preparing GK180 Based Tesla K40 “ATLAS’ GPU With Over 4 Teraflops Compute Performance
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
Then you should say it, and not ask questions. That is weird and impolite. At least I can now check whether you are right.
Play some of the games I have listed on max settings.
The way forward is an 8gb version of the R9 290X
Last edited:
The thing is. At the time when some people where buying 2gb Nvidia cards over 3GB AMD cards there existed numerous, though not frequent examples of when 2GB was not enough for some scenarios.
Now there exist no examples and scenarios where 4GB R9 290X would be insufficient.
Your arguments are busted.
I checked five last games listed on gamegpu:
for double resolution you need this more Vram:
Shadow warrior 33%
Alien Rage 7%
Total war rome ii 15%
Arma III 25%
Lost planet III 20%
It's only really one person winding everyone up though. And there's a history of it. Spot the troll.
I can not believe he has not gone yet with the childish tirades he has been throwing at people.
sand dune no one is arguing except you.
I see people stating there case wether you choose to agree is your choice.
Your continued use of terms such as "Your arguments are busted" "In that case you should look at my arguments numbered 2 and 3" will result in an infraction and possible holiday consider this a warning - TBag
I see people stating there case wether you choose to agree is your choice.
Your continued use of terms such as "Your arguments are busted" "In that case you should look at my arguments numbered 2 and 3" will result in an infraction and possible holiday consider this a warning - TBag
Last edited:
Why don't you ban the person above, who thinks he can just flame call names and bring nothing to an argument.
What kind of bias is that? I honestly don't know what exact terms I can use in my argument and I learn from answers that people give to me.
You can spot "your arguments are busted" just a couple of posts before I used it, directed at me.
Can you please explain yourself?
Treat it more as a discussion with two differing opinions, try not to be so aggressive
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,881
- Location
- Surrey
As above, you came in guns blazing calling Kap stupid lol.
Not really.
He later explained that AMD markets new cards for 4K, so I understood his point. Yet it's still easy to double the Vram.
There are plenty of examples where 4gb is not enough, some of us have first hand experience. Some of the guys using Titans regularly go over 4gb at high resolutions and can quote first hand.
Do you have any first hand experience you can quote from.
The graph below makes interesting reading and the resolution is not even 4K
I will be happy to see when 4GB is not enough and reducing gaming experience. Only not in case of Skyrim. It's a very bad example. Skyrim is a community project, i.e. all it's mods. It will eat any amount of memory you throw at it if you load enough mods.
I read PCper's review on 4K gaming and they agreed that AA was still needed to reduce the jaggies. Crysis 3 used 4.6GB (iirc) at 5760x1080 for me with all the details up fully. Not sure if that much is needed but that was what was reported on usage.
The graph on the previous page doesn't show whether that is peak or average memory usage either, or how long they tested each scenario for.
People have reported spikes well over 2gb on BF4 at just 1080p, and there's still some Ultra settings to come on full release.
At least we can get back on topic now
