• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia RTX 6000 series (codename Rubin)

30% more cores going to 3nm seems like a let down

They'll push clocks with the power savings, it will probably still be a 600w GPU

I think it will close to 100% faster than 4090

Still not fast enough to run Borderlands 4 at native 4k 60fps
Nearly spat my tea out lol
 

Prices of next gen tech made at TSMC is going to be comical by looks of this. :rolleyes:
Not sure why we need TSMC for consumer cards, the best generation recently from Nvidia was when they went with Samsung. For example a 3060ti was 50% faster than a 2060S after a single generation yet after the subsequent 2 gens of TSMC chips the 5060ti is only 30% faster than the 3060ti.
 
Imagine the performance jump if Rubin has a 20-30% performance per watt improvement from architecture alone (separate from any process improvements). It's been such a long time since we had this.

Feel we're at the point where it's needed now. They can't easily go above 512bit bus and 600W for the 6090 this time, as things will start to fall apart at that stage.
 
What's the bus width got to do with it though, by itself it doesn't increase performance, memory bandwidth it just acts as a bottleneck on the GPU if the GPU is powerful enough, which you can get around anyway by adding more cache or using HBM. In case faster gddr7 is available, you don't need higher bus width to get more gddr7 bandwidth
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom