OcUK Cinebench R15 benchmark thread

Davanius · 28 Apr 2017 at 09:57

My Ryzen 1600 scores 1309cb multi with a 3.9 Ghz overclock.

Jumper118 · 30 Apr 2017 at 17:31

FlanK3r said:
nice, can I ask you, what exactly DRAM kit do you have? Im thinking about some "cheap" and good B-die for Ryzen/Kabylake. Thank you.

i got a 3600c16 trident z from alex@ro on hwbot that was a binning reject

my ln2 session went very badly

this is the only score i managed to get a screenshot of. i did get 2173cb at 4.8ghz but it bsod on the opening of cpuz

also i had a lot off issues with ram being too cold and board getting wet as a result of try to keep the ram warm.

icey_haj · 2 May 2017 at 21:18

1600 @ 4.05Ghz
Asrock X370 Fatal1ty K4
16GB running at 2400Mhz CL 16 (Trident Z RGB 3200)
1319 Multi thread

FlanK3r · 3 May 2017 at 14:40

Try to get back BIOS 1001/1002. Seems better for LN2. I did also Ln2 OC few days again, but I have not much LN2, so I ended with 4950 MHz and 1.488V. I started from low clocks and low voltages in system "step by step"

Jumper118 · 3 May 2017 at 17:45

FlanK3r said:
Try to get back BIOS 1001/1002. Seems better for LN2. I did also Ln2 OC few days again, but I have not much LN2, so I ended with 4950 MHz and 1.488V. I started from low clocks and low voltages in system "step by step"

thanks for the tip. i may get some more at the end of may/beginning of june.

Scrumpy_Jack · 4 May 2017 at 02:35

Fresh install of Ryzen 1700x, Crosshair VI, Flare X 3200 C14. Quick overclock of 3.92....

Jumper118 · 5 Jun 2017 at 19:09

FlanK3r said:
Try to get back BIOS 1001/1002. Seems better for LN2. I did also Ln2 OC few days again, but I have not much LN2, so I ended with 4950 MHz and 1.488V. I started from low clocks and low voltages in system "step by step"

well i couldnt get the hero to boot to windows 1/2 the time, but i still improved my score using the craptastic prime x370 pro. got a cold bug around -130 cos i cant change some voltages that i can on the hero.

also i dont get why everyone gets ~1300cb with 1600 or 1600x. mine seems average enough yet i find it hard to score below 1320cb

also 1500X with improved ram speeds

kitfit1 · 5 Jun 2017 at 20:19

Jumper118 · 5 Jun 2017 at 21:12

have you tried running faster than 3200mhz on the newest bios yet?

kitfit1 · 5 Jun 2017 at 21:31

Jumper118 said:
have you tried running faster than 3200mhz on the newest bios yet?

I can if i only run it with 2 mem sticks, but it has tended to be a bit unstable. Apart from that i actually want to run the rig with 4 mem sticks because Lightroom is ultrafast with 32GB of ram. I'm more than happy with it as it is but hopefully when the official bios is released higher ram speed for 4 sticks might be possible.

Jumper118 · 5 Jun 2017 at 22:53

kitfit1 said:
I can if i only run it with 2 mem sticks, but it has tended to be a bit unstable. Apart from that i actually want to run the rig with 4 mem sticks because Lightroom is ultrafast with 32GB of ram. I'm more than happy with it as it is but hopefully when the official bios is released higher ram speed for 4 sticks might be possible.

OK fair enough. I suppose 32gb at 3200c16 is pretty good. Just tested my 1800x on air and that can't hold mine stable at 3333c12, that means it IMC is weaker than my 1500x and 1600.

humbug · 6 Jun 2017 at 18:06

Is this actually being updated?

kitfit1 · 6 Jun 2017 at 18:42

humbug said:
Is this actually being updated?

I would guess not, it is a 4 year old thread. I read somewhere a few days ago that Cinebench was geared towards AMD cpu's. Well, when you look at the 1st page here.................that's clearly rubbish. Now that Ryzen absolutely wipes the floor in multithreading, even at much lower clocks than Intel.........................i'm sort of guessing silence is all that will be heard.

humbug · 6 Jun 2017 at 18:46

CAT are you updating this mate?

if not let someone else do it?

Jumper118 · 6 Jun 2017 at 20:04

kitfit1 said:
I would guess not, it is a 4 year old thread. I read somewhere a few days ago that Cinebench was geared towards AMD cpu's. Well, when you look at the 1st page here.................that's clearly rubbish. Now that Ryzen absolutely wipes the floor in multithreading, even at much lower clocks than Intel.........................i'm sort of guessing silence is all that will be heard.

lol that is pretty funny. this benchmark isnt really geared towards any cpu. it works very well on all platforms regardless of age and cpu power.

yes you are right it's not being updated any more.

humbug said:
CAT are you updating this mate? if not let someone else do it?

no, its not been updated for years

Blackbadger · 12 Jun 2017 at 20:50

Firstly - not my score. - The new Xeon 24 core cpus released today.

x299/threadripper is for the weak. These new chips are awesome. - Who's going to be first to oc them to break 80k ?

Jumper118 · 12 Jun 2017 at 21:03

Blackbadger said:
Firstly - not my score. - The new Xeon 24 core cpus released today.

x299/threadripper is for the weak. These new chips are awesome. - Who's going to be first to oc them to break 80k ?

thats 2 cpu's not one

so its not that fast.

Blackbadger · 12 Jun 2017 at 21:07

Indeed, whats wrong with 2cpus

?? Cost.

Frozennova · 12 Jun 2017 at 21:25

Blackbadger said:
Indeed, whats wrong with 2cpus ?? Cost.

Not really an apples to apples comparison when comparing to thread ripper

A pair of Naples/Epyc would be a fair comparison

Jumper118 · 12 Jun 2017 at 21:34

Blackbadger said:
Indeed, whats wrong with 2cpus ?? Cost.

yeah that cost thing

i also thought it was one cpu for a min so i was mildly disjointed.