*** OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList ***

[Cyanide]

I've just changed my processor from the one in my sig to a Q6600 @ 3.4. My score's just gone from mid 30's to 53.22fps.

Only a 300mhz boost and Crysis doesn't take advantage of Quad cores, so I think I was right in thinking the cache was killing my Crossfire

 

[Senture]

Isn't Crossfire bottlenecked by a weak CPU?

I'm not 100% sure on this. I've never used crossfire and I've seen no benchmarks, but a good number of people have said this.

 

[Cyanide]

56.31fps

Not bad

 

[gurusan]

updated

 

[marc2003]

here's my sucky new score.

26.685

 

[gurusan]

updated

 

[Leebone]

56.31fps

Not bad

Try it in 32bit mode, should brake 60fps

 

[-=Vect0r=-]

50.075

 

[jbloggs]

Updated:

53.03

 

[wolvers]

58.455

 

[Hesky82]

Humm.. 58.4 FPS with a gts clocked at just 750mhz

 

[ZoomZ]

I was taggin 59-61 at 800/1050 on a fresh install of xp with the 174.70 drivers .

 

[Skyboat]

Why can't people post properly-sized screenies? How the hell are you supposed to read text that small I'll never know

 

[gurusan]

updated

 

[wolvers]

Humm.. 58.4 FPS with a gts clocked at just 750mhz

I know what your sayin'. I thought it seemed a bit high looking at other results.

What can I say? I just ran the benchmark as per the settings requested.

E2160@3ghz to E7200@4ghz = 13fps

Is about 48fps in DX10.

 

[wolvers]

Why can't people post properly-sized screenies? How the hell are you supposed to read text that small I'll never know

Alright pal, wind yer neck in. I can read it no problem.

Seen as you're sight's poor..........

 

[Antx777]

Alright pal, wind yer neck in. I can read it no problem.

Seen as you're sight's poor..........

Snip[/QUOTE]

58.455 sure is a VERY good score for a SINGLE GTS, my 2x GTX8800 in sli run at 58FPS on stock settings. Yea, so good score, VERY good score:)


~Ant

 

[Skyboat]

Alright pal, wind yer neck in. I can read it no problem.

Seen as you're sight's poor..........

I'm so sorry for not having an electronic microscope available on my PC then.

Seriously, touched a nerve? And for the record it wasn't a specific rant aimed at you, it's just the latest in a number of screenies which are resized to stupid dimensions.

 

[wolvers]

Seriously, touched a nerve? And for the record it wasn't a specific rant aimed at you, it's just the latest in a number of screenies which are resized to stupid dimensions.

Fair enough, I thought you were having a go at me. Just ask for it bigger though. No need to get all sarcy.

And for the record, it's the res that is listed on image shack as 'for message boards'.

 

[marc2003]

And for the record, it's the res that is listed on image shack as 'for message boards'.

who cares what imageshack says. you can't read the text. simple as that. and there is nothing wrong with my eyesight thanks.