-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
OcUK Zen3 review thread
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
They seem faster for gaming on the whole in most reviews and pretty much faster in every other respect.
Also nearly every review is RIP intel.
Also nearly every review is RIP intel.
Meh, this is typical Tech Power Up when it comes to CPU reviews, all old games and little difference between low and high core count CPU's, yes if you go by their reviews the conclusion you would come away with is there is no point getting anything better than a 9600K.
If you look at other reviews they show newer games as much as 20% faster than a 10900K.
Overall it is a mixed bag tho, i think Zen 3 will mature much better than current Intel.
Techpowerup is a dodgy place for benchmarks, go watch the gamernexus review and watch the 5950x destroy intel's finest. Enough with the Intel shilling, it's time to move on. AMD are now the fastest for gaming.
CS:GO seems to really love the new architecture for some reason.
E-sport with 360hz screens will buy them in droves.
Look at this ####!
+48% WTF?
AMD simply made their new generation really strong
AMD crushed Intel today and you try to defend them?
How much are Intel paying you for their shill?
The demand for amd Ryzen zen 3 is beyond anything Intel ever had in their whole history.
Game over for Intel and nvidia.
The rise of the new cpu and gpu and gaming overlord Queen AMD
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
7 stages of grief, denial is the first. 
as said already numerous times bias amd benchmark csgo and the game everyone plays serious sam ROFL !
now look again at those benchmarks and tell me im a shill ..literally every res and game amd behind.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-5800x/16.html
Ok that site isn't called nexus but fine. Try looking at a review with the actual best binned amd chip and you'll see the 5950x definitely wins everywhere (except Red Dead) for whatever it's worth. Even on top of OC 10900.
The chip TPU is showing there is the 5800X.
AMD has the 5950X AND the 5900X above the 5800X and you're saying the 5800X isn't beating all the Intel chips...
I agree with you. The 5800X does not beat all the Intel chips.
The 5900X beats a lot more and the 5950X beats them all (except one game).
Dg everything is relevant, you can't dismiss what doesn't suit your argument, its very obvious to everyone you're doing it, you're cherry-picking. Its a mixed bag not so good in old games, much better in new games.
cherry picking its modern games across all res how is that cherry picking ? yet just showing csgo benchmark and saying yes its faster.
Its more than just CS:GO, its a whole bunch of games and in some Zen 3 is miles ahead. Others they are behind.
No its not a perfect slam dunk, but its good.
Gaming Performance Average
Here’s a look at performance averaged out across the 11-game sample. As you can see the Ryzen 9 5950X and 10900K are a match in terms of performance.
https://www.techspot.com/review/2131-amd-ryzen-5950x/
no cherry picking this is across all reviews for GAMING.
AMD arent quicker. hype train got people.
Here’s a look at performance averaged out across the 11-game sample. As you can see the Ryzen 9 5950X and 10900K are a match in terms of performance.
https://www.techspot.com/review/2131-amd-ryzen-5950x/
no cherry picking this is across all reviews for GAMING.
AMD arent quicker. hype train got people.
no people were moaning i used the 5800 instead of the 5950 so there is a proven benchmark showing its no faster than intel at games.
so £800 amd CPU at games is equal to £659 intel cpu yet people are like wooooheee AMD quicker lol,
its actually really funny amd have brought out dearer level par performance. people lapping them up.
the better value is with intel and you could have had this performance for a while it never seems to change. same old story.
so £800 amd CPU at games is equal to £659 intel cpu yet people are like wooooheee AMD quicker lol,
its actually really funny amd have brought out dearer level par performance. people lapping them up.
the better value is with intel and you could have had this performance for a while it never seems to change. same old story.
What hype train.
You've just been dragged off your one man train where you were saying AMD was behind Intel in everything because you were staring at ONE review using the 3rd best AMD cpu.
Now at least you've come to terms with how good the best AMD cpu is.
I reckon there's some variance between reviews but it's definitely right up there with Intel now if you can afford such an expensive cpu for gaming alone.
are people just seeing what they want to see
loads of benchies showing they slower at gaming on the whole. yet rip intel lol.
A lot of reviewers are still using a 2080Ti/3070 which is a bottleneck for even a 10700k/10900k. The reviewers using a 3080/3090 are showing much more consistent wins for the AMD CPUs.
Also needs to be noted that they haven't tuned the RAM either. 3600MHz CL16 is the fastest I've seen used so far, AMD said 3800-4000MHz is the sweet spot for this gen.
I think it's pretty undeniable AMD have the lead here.