And there will, for a long long time, but i believe that as soon as these hit 500GB, the companies making the mainstream laptops/desktops will put these in instead, 500GB sounds like a great bit and it's a sacrifice that's more than worth it.I can't see big storage drives being replaced by SSD.
While SSD will indeed increase in capacity and decrease in price, so will mechanical hard drives.
I'm about to buy some SSDs to RAID up as an OS drive, but for main storage mechanical drives are 1/10th of the price of SSDs.
I'd like to see mechanical drives focus on capacity and cost, Western Digital seems a step ahead with their Greenpower drives. They're cheap, high capacity, low power drives. Perhaps in 5 years time we'll start to see mechanical drives go the way of CRTs, but even then I think there may still be a niche for mechanicals.
And there will, for a long long time, but i believe that as soon as these hit 500GB, the companies making the mainstream laptops/desktops will put these in instead, 500GB sounds like a great bit and it's a sacrifice that's more than worth it.
I can't see big storage drives being replaced by SSD.
While SSD will indeed increase in capacity and decrease in price, so will mechanical hard drives.
I'm about to buy some SSDs to RAID up as an OS drive, but for main storage mechanical drives are 1/10th of the price of SSDs.
I'd like to see mechanical drives focus on capacity and cost, Western Digital seems a step ahead with their Greenpower drives. They're cheap, high capacity, low power drives. Perhaps in 5 years time we'll start to see mechanical drives go the way of CRTs, but even then I think there may still be a niche for mechanicals.
I'd like to see mechanical drives focus on capacity and cost, Western Digital seems a step ahead with their Greenpower drives. They're cheap, high capacity, low power drives. Perhaps in 5 years time we'll start to see mechanical drives go the way of CRTs, but even then I think there may still be a niche for mechanicals.
Do you really need ssd's that big...
You dont really need one to act as a simple storage device.. The main benefit is for the os and applicaitons.. unless you have a multOS system, I really wouldnt see the need for anything greather than 64gb ish...
Non of my windows partiotns are greater than 25gb... some as small as 10gb...
Id much prefer performance, reliability and longevity over size....
To be fair to OCZ they were one of the first if not the first company to bring a fast ssd (v1/v2) to the market at a reasonable prices.
Any update on this?
The Vertex series with onboard DRAM cache look like they might be Intel SSD killers certainly in terms of priceerformance.
I also got a chance to talk with OCZ's Alex Mei a little about the infamous JMicron memory controller in relation to OCZ's SSDs. OCZ Core Series SSDs and every other manufacturer’s SSDs that use a JMicron controller have had some issues with stuttering during write operations. Mei assured me that while the new Solid and Apex Series SSDs continue to use JMicron memory controllers, they have been heavily optimized to minimize any write performance issues that may crop up during normal use.
Ok, so these use JMicron controllers too.. hmmm.
They say Core/Solid/Apex series.. jmicron for me (and the fact that this isn't a new part) is basically a dirty word in my view and it seems quite a few other people's mind too.