From Wiki..What ARE you on about
1977
Williams entered a customer March 761 for the 1977 season
Though this is after the Frank Williams Racing Cars which used Brabham in '69 I think
From Wiki..What ARE you on about
1977
Williams entered a customer March 761 for the 1977 season
What ARE you on about
That's it then . . .From Wiki..1977
Williams entered a customer March 761 for the 1977 season
For the 1978 season, Patrick Head designed his first Williams: the FW06. Head designed the FW07 for the 1979 season . . .
That's it then . . .
1977 . . . a customer March 761 . . . Ye Gods, that REALLY is hypocritical
Don't see the problem with customer cars myself if it helps teams to get on the grid. It's always been acceptable in sportscar/endurance racing and the like.
I oppose customer cars. Eventually there will only be 2 or 3 chassis on the grid as the naff ones get replaced by bought ones. Might as well make it a one make series.
Not if you say that the customer chassis cannot run the same engine as the supplier chassis
I oppose customer cars. Eventually there will only be 2 or 3 chassis on the grid as the naff ones get replaced by bought ones. Might as well make it a one make series.
I don't believe.... snip
With the exception of Ferrari and McLaren, if any of the mentioned teams had seasons like Honda did in their last two seasons or Toyota 06 & 07, their board would be saying "We need a winning car... instead of throwing £m into making one, let's buy a proven Chassis / Engine combo". Either that or leave... simple as. Why run at the back when your competitors have shifted and bought customer cars now are mixing it at the front.
Oh sure, if they had those hypothetical bad seasons they could well say that. But are they likely to have seasons where they're so far off the pace that they'd decide to buy the kit from someone else? If we agree than Ferrari and McLaren probably wouldn't go down that route (they never did when times were bad for them and customer cars were allowed, after all), do we honestly think RBR, Brawn, Williams et al would?
None of this matters, of course. By the time the FIA is done, all the teams will be driving the same bloody car anyway. Only the paintjobs will be different.
Force india buy a mclaren car and start challenging for wins. Other back of the grid teams would soon follow. Then we would soon have a two or three make series.
That rarely happened when customer cars used to be allowed. Tyrrell running Matras and later a March for Jackie Stewart (before building their own car) was probably the last time that a customer car ended up at the pointy end of things on a regular basis. I'll defer to anyone who can remember another example.
€15m + €10m = €25mKimi Raikkonen stands to make more money in 2010 if he takes a sabbatical. Germany's Auto Motor und Sport reports that if the Finn accepts McLaren's current offer, he will earn €15m in 2010, as opposed to €17m if he has a season on the sidelines.
According to his termination deal with Ferrari, the Italian team has promised to pay Raikkonen €17m if he does not race in F1 next year, and €10m if he finds suitable employment elsewhere. (http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news/detail/091106091155.shtml)
€15m + €10m = €25m
€25m > €17m
Shurely shome mishtake . . . unless McLaren are planning to pay him just €5m
Germany's Auto Motor und Sport reports that if the Finn accepts McLaren's current offer, he will earn €15m in 2010