It varied race to race due to different setups. So couldnt give you a exact figure even if i wanted to.
fair enough - thank you
It varied race to race due to different setups. So couldnt give you a exact figure even if i wanted to.
One thing i can tell you though considering how light the parts are, some races you could barely lift the Mainplane.
I still remember watching the tongue of a Ferrari a couple of years ago being removed and having fairly large 2 blokes lifting it onto a trolly to move it.
The clunk as it hit the floor of the garage was fairly telling.
hope maclaren secretly put kers in.
I hope 2 or 3 teams do. But I can't see it being mclaren. Is there any punshiment/fine for putting kers in. As they have all signed a fota agreement.
The punishment is being kicked out of FOTA.... which is about as important as being kicked out of the Chess club at school for having a girlfriend....
I thought it was common knowledge that Williams would continue with KERS development?
From what ive seen, it really doesnt benefit a race car in its current capacity.
I would love it to be on all the cars but, if it was, what would be the point? You would have 20-24 cars who all have a 80BHP boost out of a corner for 6 seconds a lap. Would that make F1 more interesting? Id sooner have turbos back really.
Already agreed.In its current form it is not beneficial.
i'll admit on some tracks [long distance to the 1st corner] its great. Over a race distance the extra weight and balancing issues rear their ugly head. If having a extra 80 bhp was so great [lets face it,80 bhp in a road car would be awesome] then surely the Mclaren and Ferrari would not have finished 70 points+ behind Brawn and Red Bull?
How many points did Hamilton win due to Brawn and Red Bull concentrating on 2010 is the question.
when did they start concentrating on 2010? maclaren said about 2/3 throught the season they had 1 more update then they were all on the 2010 car also.