Poll: Official 2023 United States Grand Prix Thread - Circuit of the Americas, Austin - Round 19

Rate the USA race out of ten


  • Total voters
    84
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mercedes make mistake, Scam finds way to aim at Red Bull. Shouldn’t be allowed on the forums on a school night, he has too much sugar at the weekends.

Sigh, seriously though, it’s so boring… can’t have any actual discussions because of that sort of stuff.

Feel for Hamilton, felt he drove a great race and with a little better strategy could have challenged Max for the win. Always disappointing when something like this happens.
If Max was out of spec you can bet there would be a witch hunt on.

It's not even the driver that's at fault, it's the team who likely made a mistake.
 
That's a fair point. Although I suppose with the plank you could require that they're all removed and passed to the stewards under observation and then they can scrutinise more if necessary, but you're right that - in general - it's not going to be logistically possible especially with another race next weekend.
100%, parts like that should be in inventory unlike fuel, etc. which would need to be drained. Having a back-to-back doesn't help either.
 
Gutted for Lewis.

Thought he made good progress towards getting p2 in the championship today, but no I guess that will go to Perez who absolutely doesn't deserve it after being utterly awful most of the season.

Mercedes management/strategy teams showing how **** they are again.
 
Last edited:
Did anyone else notice them throwing Danny Ric out on a set of softs to get that fastest lap away from Hamilton near the end.
That's some tinfoil hat level thought process. He pitted because there was a huge chunk of debris in his front left.

https://imgur.com/a/mUduGer

His car was also compromised for most of the race:
Tost: "For Daniel, in the first stint the front left brake duct broke, affecting the aerodynamics heavily, and losing a lot of downforce…the car was no longer balanced. I apologise to Daniel for this failure…in Mexico hopefully the car will be reliable [for] a strong qualifying and good race."
 
Last edited:
I didn't know every car wasn't checked.

Seems harsh to Do random checks, find a DSQ but never know half the field could be worse

IMO, if something is found every car should be checked for that.

Especially if 50% of the cars they checked show the issue.

How do they know it wasn't this specific track causing potential issues?
 
That's some tinfoil hat level thought process. He pitted because there was a huge chunk of debris in his front left.

https://imgur.com/a/mUduGer

His car was also compromised for most of the race:
Tost: "For Daniel, in the first stint the front left brake duct broke, affecting the aerodynamics heavily, and losing a lot of downforce…the car was no longer balanced. I apologise to Daniel for this failure…in Mexico hopefully the car will be reliable [for] a strong qualifying and good race."
That makes more sense. Is a bit early to have to worry about that point effecting Perez's P2 in the championship.
 
"A physical floor and a plank wear inspection was carried out on car numbers 01, 16, 44 and 04."

The list of things checked is quite long. My beef is the nature of how this check was done in particular under these circumstances as this track on a sprint weekend. It's a very bumpy track. You've supposedly randomly* checked 4 cars. You've then found 50% of that sample size to be at fault. Given that this was the ONLY check failed throughout a vast list of checks, surely you then go and check every car's floor?
Why single out 2 cars? On that basis, half the pack may have had floors too worn away and then they could have taken the opportunity to wave it this week due to exceptional circumstances, unless they particularly want to disqualify half the grid. It would be a bad look for F1.

*Randomly after liaising with Horner
 
That's some tinfoil hat level thought process.
Except they pitted Tsunoda to do exactly the same thing and he got it... So it's hardly tinfoil hat is it.

Especially if 50% of the cars they checked show the issue.

How do they know it wasn't this specific track causing potential issues?
Indeed. Like I've said 3 times in this thread the track looked bumpy for everyone. Every chance it could have affected everyone's floors, or at least a high proportion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom