• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

Locky said:
My 480s are not far behind.

core i7 950 @ 4.2 and GTX 480 SLI @ 875/2050


3DMark Score P11431

Graphics score 12251

Physics Score 10100

Combined Score 8767

GraphicsTest1 52.75 FPS

GraphicsTest2 56.19 FPS

GraphicsTest3 77.35 FPS

GraphicsTest4 39.35 FPS

PhysicsTest 32.06 FPS

CombinedTest 40.78 FPS
Click to expand...
My SLI 580's at stock speeds

Untitled-38.png


A little higher with my 580's overclocked :)

P11522.png
 
Last edited:
Nice score Chaparral ;).

Did you overclock more on the non stock run?. You have higher "Physics" and "Combined" scores.
 
I'm a bit new to this so could someone tell me if the following are acceptable scores for my rig (see sig.)

3DMark Score - P3291
Graphics score - 3257
Physics score - 3642
Combined score - 3094
Graphicstest1 - 14.99 FPS
Graphicstest2 - 15.46FPS
Graphicstest3 - 19.7 FPS
Graphicstest4 - 9.97 FPS
Physicstest - 11.56 FPS
Combinedtest - 14.39 FPS

This is with the free 3DMark11 version and therefore is with all the settings at default (as you cant change them without upgrading obviously!)

Thanks for any feedback since the gfx card is a new one and I wanted to make sure it was operating OK! (3DMark 06 score went from 13065 on my GTX260 to 14233 on the GTX460 SC!)

Cheers,

StevieP
 
StevieP. Your 3dmark11/06 scores is in line with your setup so no worries there.

Your Q6600 (clocked low at only 2.7GHz for some reason?) has more to give but pointless unless you try pushing your 460GTX more as that is the weaker link in terms of your overall score. With 3dmark11, you'd expect your graphics score to be higher than the CPU score but you can clearly see the feisty 460GTX is holding you back a little bit. Don't worry about it or think about getting another GPU as your 600W PSU won't cope.

Just thought, why not use your 260GTX for dedicated Physx use to get use out of it?
 
J.D said:
Nice score Chaparral ;).

Did you overclock more on the non stock run?. You have higher "Physics" and "Combined" scores.
Click to expand...
;) I changed my memory speed from 1333mhz to 1600mhz which knocked up my physics & combined score ;)


Both tests were done with my CPU at 4400 or 4600mhz...(but can't remember which speed)..
 
Last edited:
FMTopfan said:
StevieP. Your 3dmark11/06 scores is in line with your setup so no worries there.

Your Q6600 (clocked low at only 2.7GHz for some reason?) has more to give but pointless unless you try pushing your 460GTX more as that is the weaker link in terms of your overall score. With 3dmark11, you'd expect your graphics score to be higher than the CPU score but you can clearly see the feisty 460GTX is holding you back a little bit. Don't worry about it or think about getting another GPU as your 600W PSU won't cope.

Just thought, why not use your 260GTX for dedicated Physx use to get use out of it?
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reply, good to know my score is just about where it shoudl be! :)

Regards to the other advice, I am gonna try pushin my 460 with the supplied EVGA software but I think its already factory overclocked (SC stands for superlocked I think!)
Definitely gonna ramp up my Q6600 a bit more but I'm fairly new to overclocking so gonna take it slow!

My GTX260 is being sold on to a mate but I'm intrigued to know how to use it as a dedicated Physx card? How would that work??

Thanks again....

StevieP
 
StevieP said:
Thanks for the reply, good to know my score is just about where it shoudl be! :)

Regards to the other advice, I am gonna try pushin my 460 with the supplied EVGA software but I think its already factory overclocked (SC stands for superlocked I think!)
Definitely gonna ramp up my Q6600 a bit more but I'm fairly new to overclocking so gonna take it slow!

My GTX260 is being sold on to a mate but I'm intrigued to know how to use it as a dedicated Physx card? How would that work??

Thanks again....

StevieP
Click to expand...

Yip, SC simply means superclocked.

And if your using the 260GTX for Physx, you need to simply install it in the second PCIe slot (your 460GTX is the main GPU) and leave it running as a single GPU.

As i'm not using a Nvidia GPU, I'm not sure where these options are exactly in the Nvidia Control panel, but you need to set the follow options for use on your 260GTX:-
-Set PhysX GPU acceleration: Enabled on GeForce 260GTX
- Select an SLI configuration: Do not use SLI*
*may already be disabled because your not using the SLI bridge to connect another GPU.

Before your start to overclock your CPU, make sure your current temps are below 60c under load, otherwise you'll lock up your system. Don't try pushing it if your have a stock cooler as this won't dissipate the heat fast enough. Its not worth buying a better CPU cooler because your looking at £20 to start off and gains won't be worth while.

If you run into any issues, I'm sure a fellow Nvidia user will be better able to help. I'd be happy to assist you if you need further help, just message me in future.
 
Do you know if I will see a noticable difference in real world gaming performance if I use the 260 too then? Any idea if my PSU would cope with having 2 card slotted in??

Regards to the CPU overclocking, my temps seem to idle at 38-40 with my current overclock and jump to 55'ish when gaming - my cooler is a Gelid Tranquillo but I'm by no means an expert at applying thermal paste etc so there is probably room for improvement in my fitting!

Thanks for the advice!!!

StevieP
 
Is this correct score for freeware run of 3Dmark11?

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/553060

Intel 2500k (4.7ghz)
2x2gb 1600 9,9,9,24 T1
Inno3D 460 1gb 880/2100

3DMark Score -- P4170
Graphics score -- 3851
Physics Score -- 8660
Combined Score -- 3609
GraphicsTest1 -- 17.58 FPS
GraphicsTest2 -- 18.26 FPS
GraphicsTest3 -- 23.68 FPS
GraphicsTest4 -- 11.77 FPS
PhysicsTest -- 27.49 FPS
CombinedTest -- 16.79 FPS

Also should i place the physics on to the CPU or leave it on the CPU via nvidia's control panel options?

Kamz
 
Last edited:
3DMark Score
P5074
Graphics score
5368
Physics Score
4451
Combined Score
4227
GraphicsTest1
23.22 FPS
GraphicsTest2
24.36 FPS
GraphicsTest3
33.53 FPS
GraphicsTest4
17.41 FPS
PhysicsTest
14.13 FPS
CombinedTest
19.66 FPS

run on rig in sig, mild overclock 850/1950 on gpu.

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/545790
 
Last edited:
StevieP said:
Do you know if I will see a noticeable difference in real world gaming performance if I use the 260 too then? Any idea if my PSU would cope with having 2 card slotted in??
Click to expand...

Yes, you will see improvements in the many games that have Physx support, two of my favourite games Batman: AA, Mafia II has the support and will improve your framerates. Otherwise for Ati users, we turn off Physx and lose the effects or just play it on Low. Your 460GTX alone needs a 450 PSU, then the 260GTX needs 550W PSU. Your better off not killing your PSU exceeding the rating supply and get a PSU with SLI support. Again, not worth doing for the outlay.

kamz said:
Is this correct score for freeware run of 3Dmark11?

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/553060

...

Also should i place the physics on to the CPU or leave it on the CPU via nvidia's control panel options?
Click to expand...

Yip, right 3dmark version. Most Nvidia users leave the Physx as default on the GPU - skews results when compared to Ati users as your Physics/CPU score will be higher - but its whatever gets the most 3dmarks. Try either and see what difference it makes in 3dmark11.
 
Should make no difference as physics are handled with direct compute :)

Managed to tweak the clocks on the 470 another 50mhz to 900 stable :) scored 5215 overall score
 
johny dolan said:
P12455 3DMarks

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/580218
Click to expand...

3DMark Score - P7,477
Graphics score - 7,270
Physics Score - 10,448
Combined Score - 6,165
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/605475

I've got a similar setup to yourself and easily clocked the 2600k to 4.4GHz. Don't know why the link didn't show 4.4GHz though but here's the CPU-Z link.

Your GPU score though was double of mine (5970@780/1090MHz GPUZ) which is amazing :), is your clocks really that much higher than mine? It's great though if the addition of 1 5870 to your 5970 has managed help you double the score.
 
3DMark Score
P8936

Graphics score
10279

Physics Score
6832

Combined Score
5890

GraphicsTest1
44.51 FPS


GraphicsTest2
54.77 FPS


GraphicsTest3
66.5 FPS


GraphicsTest4
29.64 FPS


PhysicsTest
21.69 FPS


CombinedTest
27.4 FPS

2 6950 both unlocked, at 930/1375

is the scares right?
 
FMTopfan said:
3DMark Score - P7,477
Graphics score - 7,270
Physics Score - 10,448
Combined Score - 6,165
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/605475

I've got a similar setup to yourself and easily clocked the 2600k to 4.4GHz. Don't know why the link didn't show 4.4GHz though but here's the CPU-Z link.

Your GPU score though was double of mine (5970@780/1090MHz GPUZ) which is amazing :), is your clocks really that much higher than mine? It's great though if the addition of 1 5870 to your 5970 has managed help you double the score.
Click to expand...

From memory my cpu was either 5 gig or 5.2 and the 5970 was overclocked to match the clocks of my stock 5870.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom