****Official Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 thread****

yes i reckon cod4 and WAW graphics.textures etc are superior. first lot of textures i observed on MW3 immediatly put an image of cod4's textures in my mind. lol

plus, why is it so blurry? dont understand why they would decrease the quality of the graphics? or are pc's not getting better graphics like MW2 had on pc over the console versions?
Yes the first thing I noticed was it was blurry as well, I don't know why they have it set like that by default, but luckily you can fix it by changing the settings as others have said. They should look at changing the defaults in a patch IMO as most people probably won't realise. At first I thought it must be running at a low resolution, it looked so bad.
 
I have always been looking forward to this game since it was released in the press that they were making it and I think it is a good game.

The only thing I was worried about was my GPU not running the game very well as I only have a HD5770, but it runs nicely on high settings with no AA. I am still upgrading to a 6870 tho.

Good game and worth the wait and money!

A 5770 should be able to max this out with ease, no need to turn AA off. It is not a very demanding game.
 
Agreed.



I had to read this over a few times to comprehend it but MW3 is more fun than BF3 and scores well. What's money got to do with it?

Just because it's using a dated graphics engine people shouldn't buy it?

Gameplay > Graphics every single time.

MW3 is more fun? Purely your opinion I understand, if you enjoy quick scoping kiddies on tiny maps that shouldn't even have sniper rifles then that's your bag.
 
Quick scoping is quicker, is that a good thing?

Your in a CoD thread bashing the basic elements of what CoD is, are you baiting?

Still debating about getting this, so will keep an eye on this thread :)

Its fun, if you have enjoyed past CoD games then its pretty much given youl enjoy this, if you can get it cheap enough like sub £25 then your hard pushed not to, ive sunk more than that into some much worse games
 
Just finished playing pretty much solidly from around 2PM yesterday.. really enjoying it :p

Should be 1st prestige by end of today.

God i remember being like that haha, work does not permit now. got a shock when i checked my stats online for previous games and found this.

cod 4 385 hours played
MW2 244 hours played
BloPs 232 hours played
That's a fair chunk of my gaming life lol..
 
Your in a CoD thread bashing the basic elements of what CoD is, are you baiting?



Its fun, if you have enjoyed past CoD games then its pretty much given youl enjoy this, if you can get it cheap enough like sub £25 then your hard pushed not to, ive sunk more than that into some much worse games

No I'm not baiting I just think quick scoping is ridiculous, it stopped me playing cod multi. I have bought all the games apart from this one because Black ops put me off so much.
 
Id have issues with other stuff much sooner than the quick scoping, Fov for instance is the biggest. QS is just a tactic like any other, its also present in most fps games and not exclusive to cod, there are plenty videos of it in BF3.

It bugs me why you are in the official MW3 thread, you have no desire to play the game, criticize what the game is about and i struggle to see how your comments are constructive when you do not wish to invest any time in the game first.
Not being funny im just explaining why it seems your comments appear baited.
 
Still not sure on this, may get it later as COD has been my life since v.COD tbh....said all along I would not get it this time around but I keep getting drawn to it.

Previous COD stats :
COD 1 can't remember.
COD 2 over 1000hrs (no record?)
MW2 630 hrs.
BLOPS 503 hrs.

Stats Link

I want this but I don't want this....grrr :confused:
 
Dwarfs BF3 in every department.

Only thing that dwarfs BF3 is the average age of the player. I played it last night. Awful game. The only good thing is that the enjoyment of BF3 has now gone up as it was very noticeable there was more team play going on and less RPG spamming last night, as all the nubs have now left to carry on their demented epeen on MW3.
 
Last edited:
Id have issues with other stuff much sooner than the quick scoping, Fov for instance is the biggest. QS is just a tactic like any other, its also present in most fps games and not exclusive to cod, there are plenty videos of it in BF3.

It bugs me why you are in the official MW3 thread, you have no desire to play the game, criticize what the game is about and i struggle to see how your comments are constructive when you do not wish to invest any time in the game first.
Not being funny im just explaining why it seems your comments appear baited.

Okay I play MW3.

Do you think it is fair to nerf other weapons like shotgun and grenade launcher, yet leave the quickscope as a powerful one shot kill, or even apparently make it quicker than before? Where is the logic in that.

I can understand people wanting to nerf the tubing, although a lot of people do tube in MW2, arguably it is part of the game and people should just get on with it.

I cannot understand nerfing the shotguns. The shotguns in MW2 are not as ridiculous as the ones in say BC2 where you can be killed from a long distance away. Yet they seem to have weakened them by 50% in MW3.
 
Okay I play MW3.

Do you think it is fair to nerf other weapons like shotgun and grenade launcher, yet leave the quickscope as a powerful one shot kill, or even apparently make it quicker than before? Where is the logic in that.

I can understand people wanting to nerf the tubing, although a lot of people do tube in MW2, arguably it is part of the game and people should just get on with it.

I cannot understand nerfing the shotguns. The shotguns in MW2 are not as ridiculous as the ones in say BC2 where you can be killed from a long distance away. Yet they seem to have weakened them by 50% in MW3.

Havnt used a shot gun yet in MW3 so cant comment on its power but to me the shotgun is a close combat weopon, ive always thought they were over accurate (note this is differant to powered) in game and that they should be neutered past a certain distance, 25 yards is lethal accuracy, after that every yard = 1 inch of spread and this is never portrayed in game with buck shot round, slugs are a differant story and are silly leathal up to 300 yard+. im not saying the game should aim for real life mechanics but the head shot accuracy you can get with a shotgun at like 50 yards just isnt really what a shotgun is about.

As for quick scoping, if you can draw your weopon on the target that fast then its hard for them to stop you being able to get the kill, the weopon is x% lethal on one shot regardless of weather its scoped or not so the simantics of aiming cant change that much, its an everpreasent niggle on 99% of fps, the only reason its so apparant on CoD games is map size and generally the proximity of 80% your attackers not the way the developers have engineered quickscoping in to the mechanics of the weopon.
 
Well I use the SPAS extensively in MW2 and it is very weak in MW3. In MW2 you could count on getting a one shot kill regularly if the enemy is maybe 12 feet away, in this game forget it. Even point blank it isn't a one shot kill any more.
 
Back
Top Bottom