Crysis windows rather niceley. Just alt+return that bad boy.
Official Crysis Demo thread
- Thread starter Born_2_Kill_83
- Start date
Crysis windows rather niceley. Just alt+return that bad boy.
I would argue that the idtech 5 engine is looking better, considering its using hundreds of gigs of textures in some scenes which will mean no more "omg look at that low res texture" complaints.
Last edited:
Most (all?) of the vehicles and weapons have been in the MP Beta for ages now anyway...
the full game script hasnt!
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 8,010
- Location
- Wiltshire
i found all high except textures on medium was smoother than turning shaders down lol.
Not sure what to put down though tbh, may have a fiddle of the settings later
I can have shaders on high, it just drops about 10fps or so
Doesn't matter too much about the others, you can tell the difference by standing in a building/shack, you'll see a lot more shadows and bounced light rather then a lifeless cartoony image.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 4,220
- Location
- Seattle area, USA
Go to the options screen and there will be a fullscreen check box click it to re-enable it. Happened on mine too.
Nice shots Greenboi.
Last edited:
Go to the options screen and there will be a fullscreen check box click it to re-enable it. Happened on mine too.
Nice shots Greenboi.
Thank you also!
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,341
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
I turned object quality down, I havent noticed shaders being as important as that or shadows
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,945
- Location
- West Bridgford
Just finished the demo, was getting around 25fps with it all on high, no AA, 1680 x 1050 res. It was too slow on my GTS, but I clocked the core back up to 600, and the memory to 900, and that did the job 
Good game, I may wait until the new GTS/GTX comes out, then play it, so I can have it on very high detail, 16xAA, etc... Anyone else feel like that?
Good game, I may wait until the new GTS/GTX comes out, then play it, so I can have it on very high detail, 16xAA, etc... Anyone else feel like that?
Just finished the demo, was getting around 25fps with it all on high, no AA, 1680 x 1050 res. It was too slow on my GTS, but I clocked the core back up to 600, and the memory to 900, and that did the job
Good game, I may wait until the new GTS/GTX comes out, then play it, so I can have it on very high detail, 16xAA, etc... Anyone else feel like that?
Im just trying to resist buying a new gfx card as i cant really run it to do it even half justice on current rig, i need a 8800 but i dunno i rarely game.
Be good to be able run it with everything maxxed out but I can justify the expense of the rig to enable me to do that. Besides it runs very well on my system (which I've only just built) with everything on MEDIUM & I think it looks fantastic. Especially when those mini nukes go off!! Wahoo!!
Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 3,095
- Location
- Norwich
Just finished the demo, was getting around 25fps with it all on high, no AA, 1680 x 1050 res. It was too slow on my GTS, but I clocked the core back up to 600, and the memory to 900, and that did the job
Good game, I may wait until the new GTS/GTX comes out, then play it, so I can have it on very high detail, 16xAA, etc... Anyone else feel like that?
Hmm, I get 24FPS on the CPU test and 26FPS on the GPU test with those settings and I have a GTX KO! My E6600 is clocked at 3.4GHz, what's yours clocked at? Loads of people seem to be getting a better frame rate than me even worse graphics cards, I don't understand. What operating system are you running?
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 23,162
- Location
- stat city
The game looks good enough on a 8800gts card. Im not buying a new graphics card just to play one game. Then again, I did buy a Wii just to play Zelda. Argh im terrible with my money.
