• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official OMG I've finally got my 5850 thread **

Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,759
Location
Co Durham
i don't think you was at stock because it's only about 5-6fps different.

maybe because im running 9.11 beta drivers

Maybe. I can't remember which drivers I used for that test or the card speeds. I really must make notes.:o

All I do know is that this is my best score with 1070/1300:

P18447
CPU: 18075
GPU: 18575

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1507595

I have just found this one at 930/1200 which must mean my score I posted earlier was at stock speeds on the 5850 or certainly much less than 930.

P16353
CPU:16169
GPU:16405


Interesting to see recently that the 9.10 beta's give you 1000 points more than the official 9.10 in Vantage.

I haven't seen how the 9.11's compare to either though.
 
Associate
Joined
6 Jul 2006
Posts
1,507
Location
co durham
would just like to no you are running your vantage on windows 7 is that right and if so there is no patch i need as i can see that even 5770 cards are beating mine,ive ordered one fro my htpc so will have to wait and see what its like
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2009
Posts
2,719
Has anyone compiled a list of vantage or other 3dmark scores?
On my first run with Vantage, I got 12,600; CPU 11,500, Graphics 13,000. (System in my sig.)
I have no idea whether these scores are good, bad, or expected.

What sort of numbers should people be expecting?
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Oct 2007
Posts
22,309
Location
North West
Has anyone compiled a list of vantage or other 3dmark scores?
On my first run with Vantage, I got 12,600; CPU 11,500, Graphics 13,000. (System in my sig.)
I have no idea whether these scores are good, bad, or expected.

What sort of numbers should people be expecting?


Score seems about right. OC for better results.

dont mean to be nasty but how come you can get 11500 on cpu and i only get 7600 for mine,:confused:


He has a quad, according to you sig you have dual core, quads own in the CPU tests in futuremark benchmarks.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2009
Posts
44
getting really ****ed of with my games crashing now just checked all power connections on psu and graphics card also reseated it, cant find anything wrong there, reset bios settings still same problems.

i did notice tho that my xfx 5850 has 2 fingers on the connection pci bit that are only half fingers? can anyone confirm they to have 2 fingers that are only half fingers, one on one side of the connection and one on other side thanks:confused:
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Oct 2009
Posts
2,719
Score seems about right. OC for better results.

Thanks Raven, that's good to know.

I'm not too concerned about overclocking yet - the only game that I've tried that I might need it is Crysis (and then only to max out settings at 1920x1200), everything else its more than capable.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Aug 2005
Posts
4,103
Location
Ealing, London
Just got mine installed yesterday, completely new to ATI so don't know if this is good/bad/average, Win7 64, Cat 9.11's.

Untitled.png
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
10,448
Location
Edinburgh.
Sorry can't be bothered to trawl through the entire thread.

But could somebody bench The Witcher and mass effect for me please? The review sites didn't have them in their tests.
 
Back
Top Bottom