• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Opteron 170 Ocing Thread ***

Big.Wayne said:
Lol yes very nice,

Not sure if I have the same [micro]stepping as you, so when I say "find peoples information accurate" I am referring to the uber steppings vs the good steppings debate/hysteria/legend etc

Hope your enjoying that 2.7GHz multi-core monster, have you got really stuck into any good gaming sessions?
Having clocked my X2 4400+ to FX60 - I was all setup for some good gaming and WHAM - gfx card dies. :(. Now I've got a busy run in till exams so I might just run a PCI ATi Rage Pro 8MB card until the G80/R600 arrives after my exams...

A PS3 will get me by in the meantime no doubt.
 
Big.Wayne said:
Lol yes very nice,

Not sure if I have the same [micro]stepping as you, so when I say "find peoples information accurate" I am referring to the uber steppings vs the good steppings debate/hysteria/legend etc

Hope your enjoying that 2.7GHz multi-core monster, have you got really stuck into any good gaming sessions?

blacklist 6 on need for speed :o

TBH its the multimedia stuff that I do that makes me grin :p

Oh wayne..update


2.8ghz 1.375 v :D
 
easyrider said:
lol :p Don't forget to post yours...............finally! :p
Whats the rush? I got my 0550 170 last Thursday?

Just because I have been asking for screenshots doesn't mean I have to post any? :)

I have been trying to get people to validate their claims a bit better, nothing personal but it makes a thread more interesting for me when people take the time to do this. . .laters!
 
easyrider said:
Its more interesting doing it yourself! :D
and?

how are people meant to do that who are reading this thread who don't have one? All I done is ask people to make sure their overclocks are stable and post screenies? easyrider I dunno why I am replying to any of your posts, its just clogging up a useful thread for no reason? I really am not sure where you are coming from?
 
Big.Wayne said:
Talk is cheap, where are your screenies you onionhead!

All I done is ask people to make sure their overclocks are stable and post screenies



I'm not sure where you are coming from
I have posted screenies and valid data!


All I ask is ..that you post your data on your opty :)
 
Last edited:
easyrider said:
I'm not sure where you are coming from!
Ok,

just to clear things up and hopefully lay them to rest :)

I am just one of many people here who is interested in this stepping thing, but its quite a task to collect all these cpus with different steppings and test them out yourself, so the idea is were all meant to *chip-in* [<--geddit!] our information and results from the various versions of this CPU floating about.

I have noticed in general that some people can claim an amazing overclock that may not actually be stable. These type of overclocks are fine for some people and not fine for others (the great "what is stable" debate etc).

Anyway by bashing down a gruelling set of torture tests and grabbing a screenshot of the feat you are removing any doubt, its all there.

I think maybe you have taken something I said personally which was not intended (onionhead aside) I was just needing some good visual proof before blowing a wad of cash on a bunch of 170's.

Hope that makes sense?

Looking forward to the screenshots of your new overclock, can't wait to get the 170 installed, just cramming in as much useage/experience/testing of this Opteron 146 *mono* core as possible (my first A64) and I have had it installed 4 weeks now, two of those weeks it was running memtest as I was testing the maximum 1:1 MHz of all four memory slots on my mobo. Both A64 and nForce4 are new to me so I been kept busy evaluating the *whole* platform. . .
 
Big.Wayne said:
Ok,



I am just one of many people here who is interested in this stepping thing, but its quite a task to collect all these cpus with different steppings and test them out yourself, so the idea is were all meant to *chip-in* [<--geddit!] our information and results from the various versions of this CPU floating about..


Of course. But you doubt people's findings....

you have upset people in this thread my stating their stability is compromised.

.
I have noticed in general that some people can claim an amazing overclock that may not actually be stable. These type of overclocks are fine for some people and not fine for others (the great "what is stable" debate etc)..


I have shown ..along with others, overclocks that are 9hrs and 12 hr stable

.
Anyway by bashing down a gruelling set of torture tests and grabbing a screenshot of the feat you are removing any doubt, its all there..


The evidence is in this thread

.
I think maybe you have taken something I said personally which was not intended (onionhead aside) I was just needing some good visual proof before blowing a wad of cash on a bunch of 170's..

There are people's results other than mine in this thread for you to evaluate..And they are giving similar results.




.
Looking forward to the screenshots of your new overclock, .


lets hope you believe them :)
 
Last edited:
easyrider said:
you have upset people in this thread my stating their stability is compromised.
:p thats so funny, if its true oops soz!

easyrider said:
lets hope you believe them :)
yes I do, thats why I asked for them, this was like a week or two ago lol? you seem to be dragging up what I was banging on about a while back, its done, its over, the stable screenies are posted, everything is sweet as a nut(ter)
 
Last edited:
Jeesas boys, you are really on it.. :rolleyes:

..reminds me of me and my brothers...25 years ago :p

Big.Wayne..how about that CCB1E 0550 VPMW stepping, have you tried to get hold of any of those buggers?
 
nah, I just re-read the thread carefully, and saw what happened. easyrider seems to have taken great offence to me saying I don't believe any claims I don't see a stable screenie for. . .hehe there ya go

I am clogged up with opterons atm, will get this 0550 UPMW installed as soon as I can, just been busy using the PC for business type activities so have been in no rush to take it offline. . .busy is good but it means I cant do 10 things at once.

I don't know much more than you about the CCB1E 0550 VPMW stepping except a few guys over at extreme saying its a wonder chip! (seen a few multi-core 3GHz screenies looks wicked).

I have been selling some of the 0551 stepping 170's I have, and keeping the two 0550's, one of which I will attack asap.
 
Big.Wayne said:
I don't know much more than you about the CCB1E 0550 VPMW stepping except a few guys over at extreme saying its a wonder chip! (seen a few multi-core 3GHz screenies looks wicked).

I have been selling some of the 0551 stepping 170's I have, and keeping the two 0550's, one of which I will attack asap.

Yeah, I have one of those coming in tomorrow.. :p

Did stumble across your sale on a famous site, nice that you are moving them :)
 
Just to update, got my rma g.skill ram back.. and got my opty in at 2.75ghz 1.4v same stepping as easyrider and agent etc :cool:

easyrider what settings is your g.skill on? im using a divider at the mo
 
scotty2004 said:
Just to update, got my rma g.skill ram back.. and got my opty in at 2.75ghz 1.4v same stepping as easyrider and agent etc :cool:

easyrider what settings is your g.skill on? im using a divider at the mo

I'm on a divider too. :(

The ram won't do 280 mhz :(
 
Frequent visitor to both XS and here and it certainly looks like the VPMW 0550 beats the UPMW 0550 in most cases. On average the UPMW will reach (and be stable) @ 2.6-2.7 where as the VPMW will clock slightly higher (100mhz) apart from the exeptional few that go to the 'magical' 3gig+. There have also been reports of a couple of UPMW's reaching 3 gig under phase but the majority wont go past 2.7 without excessive volts.

I have a UPMW stable @ 2.7 with 1.44 vcore but if I had a choice I would go for a VPMW judging by the reports that are around at the minute. The 0551 chips dont seem to clock aswell as either the 0550 steppings.

One thing I have noticed is that compared to my 165 smpw that was running @ 1.55v, my 170 running at 1.44 vcore is a lot hotter (52c under dual prime) whereas the 165 was 45c.

Just my observations :p
 
Last edited:
w3bbo said:
I have a UPMW stable @ 2.7 with 1.44 vcore but if I had a choice I would go for a VPMW judging by the reports that are around at the minute. The 0551 chips dont seem to clock aswell as either the 0550 steppings.

Just my observations :p

That seems a lot of vcore for 2.7ghz

Mine is prime stable on stock 1.3vcore at 2.7ghz(still tweaking 2.8ghz)

Is yours a CCBWE 0550 UPMW?
 
Yeah CCBWE UPMW 0550 408L batch. it will boot into windows and run s&m/OCCT/SuperPI32 at stock vcore (1.35v) but fails prime95 on core 0 within an hour or so. Needs 1.44 to become stable.
 
Back
Top Bottom