Can't say I have but id guess they are the same until 8 cores are used. Not the most helpful I know
Noted for later
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** Official Ryzen Owners Thread ***
- Thread starter Frozennova
- Start date
Can't say I have but id guess they are the same until 8 cores are used. Not the most helpful I know
Noted for later
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 1,033
- Location
- airdrie, scotland
thank you very much
Yeah me too please if they going spare, thanks
I cannot start a conversation with you guys for some reason. Low post count maybe?
Anyway add @msn.com to my forum name and email me.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 1,033
- Location
- airdrie, scotland
hi i sent you an email. thnx once again
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2014
- Posts
- 201
What a
superstar you are, thank you very much.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 1,033
- Location
- airdrie, scotland
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi guys
Quick question. Ryzen at 3.9/3333c14. In heaven benchmark at 3440x1440, 8x AA, all maxed I have one CPU core at a solid 100%
Is that normal? At such resolution am i cpu bound? also my GPU is at 100% so I guess not?
Although the FPS is fairly high it's quite jittery
Quick question. Ryzen at 3.9/3333c14. In heaven benchmark at 3440x1440, 8x AA, all maxed I have one CPU core at a solid 100%
Is that normal? At such resolution am i cpu bound? also my GPU is at 100% so I guess not?
Although the FPS is fairly high it's quite jittery
3466cl14 is faster than 3600cl16.
In my experience if it's not stable on auto settings then tweaking won't help.
Is that so? I just kinda kept them stock at cl19. How much of an improvement are we talking if i do tighten the timings? Specifically gaming related?
Try 3466 14-14-14-34 if that's stable then try tightening the secondary timings
I believe I had it set to that before, jut I tried to raise speeds and it woudlnt boot so I just went back down and stock timings. But I will try when I get done work.
I would agree HCI Memtest/GSAT can catch errors which may not show up in another test. I still do say IBT AVX / x264 , etc as sometimes the other voltages may need a tweak after what passed a pure RAM test.
Example last night used The Stilt's latest posted 3333MHz C14 Fast timings, passed ~6.5hrs of HCI memtest, I knew the SOC of 1V was gonna be too low for IBT AVX custom 13312MB to pass, I had insta Q-Code 8. Increased SOC to the usual 1.05V I need to pass those stability tests with 3333MHz and all good. Here is ZIP, has AIDA64 runs > HCI > Failed IBT > 3x IBT pass, note the failed IBT CSV file properties.
Still can't get those custom timings stable!
14-14-14-28 is now stable with everything else auto. 3333 on 3600c17. Might start playing with a couple of the secondaries at a time.
Still bootlooping but putting it down to the BIOS for now
hoping gigabyte sort it in a future update as I can't for the life of me figure out why it insists on three failed boots each time before stabilising at exactly what's in the BIOS.
Do use easytune also as x39 in BIOS sets x15 and I get 1.5ghz! Whereas x36 gives 3.6 and then easytune finishes off for 3.9. Lol.
14-14-14-28 is now stable with everything else auto. 3333 on 3600c17. Might start playing with a couple of the secondaries at a time.
Still bootlooping but putting it down to the BIOS for now
hoping gigabyte sort it in a future update as I can't for the life of me figure out why it insists on three failed boots each time before stabilising at exactly what's in the BIOS. Do use easytune also as x39 in BIOS sets x15 and I get 1.5ghz! Whereas x36 gives 3.6 and then easytune finishes off for 3.9. Lol.
