• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Ryzen Threadripper Owners Thread ***

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 66701
  • Start date Start date
I've got it benching at 4.1ghz at 1.375v but I don't think that's going to be 24/7 stable.

It does 4ghz at 1.25v though, so I think that's what I'm going to settle at and do some long term stability testing.

That's all at 3600C16 ram.
 
One EK CoolStream XT 240, one EK CoolStream XT 120 and one XSPC 160 (can't remember model).

All with push/pull fans
 
Last edited by a moderator:
james_2k said:
jeeze you have more tubes than your cpu has cores! :D
Click to expand...

Yup - that's what happens when you can't bring yourself to get rid of a 14 year old case!

Oh, and

QjxQSdt.png

:D:D:D:D:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Imgur.com for hosting.

I'd like to see your cinebench and realbench scores :-)

Impressive if that oc is stable :-)
 
james_2k said:
cinebench is a good stress test to be honest. much quicker at finding a duff oc than most things!
Click to expand...
Deffinately.

Its the first app I try with an oc and then work my way out from there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some firestrike/timespy runs at stock would be cool to see how strong Xfr kicks in. Would also give us an idea how good they are at core scaling on X399.

Edit:- that's a Very strong encoding score for real bench, think it's higher than mine! I'll check in the am.
 
Kei said:
Based on the gamers nexus video on threadripper, the cold plates on the AIO's are too small to truly cool a TR4 processor properly. This is particularly true once you realise that the finned section of the cooler where the water actually flows is quite small in the overall size of the base of the cooler.

I've been pondering the idea of upgrading my 4820K to a 1920X but finding the cost somewhat steep.
Click to expand...

Yup - if you want to OC it's a proper custom loop or don't bother imho.
 
OK, so I'm rendering out a Blender file that takes 18gb ram, rendering an after effects sequence, upscaling a video with media encoder from 1080p to 4k and playing some Rocket League while it does all it's stuff - this machine is nuts!

If anyone wants a play with the Blender file, it's here https://download.blender.org/demo/test/benchmark.zip - I rendered it in a shade under 23mins.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jigger said:
Nice. You could probably stream the game and have something getting compiled in the background too.
Click to expand...

Most likely. I've not found anything that has been able to bring the system to it's knees yet. As long as there is available memory, I can run multiple instances of anything, just each instance gets correspondingly slower the more you run, but they all seem to share resources really well.


On another note, when I installed my EK waterblock, I used thier recommended "big blob" method. DO NOT DO THIS if you are using a full cover waterblock. I wasn't happy with the temps so I decided to remount - took the block off and found the coverage wasn't any better than my AIO! This time, I did a big cross with little vertical and horizontal lines - like a star if you will - used the whole Kryonaut 1g tube. Temps are MUCH better. These are the temp comparisons I took (x methods first, blob method second):-

Stock:-

Aida stress 53c 62c
Handbrake x3 51c 59c
Blender 51c 61c

4ghz @ 1.3v:-

Aida stress 73c 81c
Handbrake x3 65c 75c
Blender 66c 76c

I couldn't run any benches higher than 1.4v, now I can go upto 1.45v (doesn't really help though as there is a massive voltage wall at 4.05ghz, hence settling for 4ghz at 1.3v (will do 3.9 and 1.25v as well).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1950x

That Blender bench run if anyone else feels brave enough to have a go - 8JEOL73.png
 
dante666 said:
amiga is that 850 psu powerful enough or would i be better off with a 1000w im going to be running 1920x with 1 maybe 2 1080,s
Click to expand...

For a single card, easy. Most I've seen it pull from the wall is 575watts and that was with the CPU @ 1.45v. At my daily 1.3v it's pulling a shade over 500 watts peak. If you want to sli, I would go with a 1000w psu.
 
Ok, so 24/7 overclock results are in. Been trying to find the right balance between voltage, power draw and heat.

I've settled on 4ghz, 1.325v vcore, 1.02v SOC, Standard LLC for vcore and SOC. This peaks temps at 74c in Prime 95 (small ffts) and 78c on the VRMs. Pulls 303watts for the cpu. OC confirmed stable with an 8hr Aida64 stress test and 10 hr Prime run (I know some will argue that isn't enough to confirm stable, but I've found that to be adequate in the past). Mem speed is 3466 16-18-18-18-36-75 @ 1.5vdimm. 1000% coverage on HCIMemtest.

Some observations, it will run 4.1ghz @ 1.425v vcore but temps reach 85c on Prime 95 where the cpu starts thermal throttling. It's perfectly fine for rendering in Blender and Handbrake etc though where temps don't exceed 80c. It will also boot and bench with 3600 ram at the same timings as above, but I can't get it beyond 130% HCImemtest coverage. I can't get it to crash in "daily" use at this mem speed though, including a 1 hr Blender render (the longest project I have) or a 2hr Adobe Premier/AE render workflow. I wonder if big coverage on HCImemtest is a bit overkill for TR?

One thing I've noticed about OC'ing TR is how "nicely" it handles failed overclocks. If you push it too far, it just hangs the system. A quick powerdown and powerup and you're back in business. No data corruption, no corrupt bios, not Wondows booting issues etc.

Hope that helps anyone dialling in thier TR OC :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
james_2k said:
haha, i couldnt, it wouldn't be nice! like kicking a puppy! :D looks like 25% faster on the 7900x @4.8 with a 216 score. So id say they are both a decent match, 25 % either way depending on thread usage. and at similar prices say they both are decent cpus!
Click to expand...

Yeah, single core Cinebench is remarkably good at showing IPC. (174/4.0)*4.8=208. Add about 1% and you get 216. Most reviews show Skylake to be about 1-2% infront of Ryzen in terms of IPC.


check out the top one on that list, now THATS a beast cpu. :)
Click to expand...

Yu[p, Intel Engineering Sample cpus are always impressive ;)
 
Ok, tried the newest bios, set a new high in Cinebench - same clocks as before (4.1ghz).

tq9tzd2.png

Stock settings very strong as well, seems to boost to 3.5ghz on all cores instead of a shade over 3.4 as before (3000 run is stock).

Threadripper performance seems to be coming along nicely :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom