Few questions for those that have played this + Arma
How is this any better/different from Arma? It looks strikingly similar only with less features and probably something an Arma mod could have achieved with a little work.
This is a genuine question and in no way meant to offend anyone, I see Xcept1 is involved with Squad so would be interested to hear his take on it. What do you guys hope to improve on? Arma is great but can be frustrating at times due to performance issues and so on.
Sorry, only just seen your post. I'm a huge fan of Arma and personally I think you can't compare Squad to Arma. There's no other game out there that can do the scope and the features that Arma does. If you're looking for the most realistic military simulator then Arma is your game to go for.
Having said that, PvP in Arma is pretty poor. Aside from the poor performance and poor VOIP, to get a decent match you normally have to be in an organised group or event. There's very little teamplay in the very few public A3 PvP servers.
With Squad you can simply hop into a server, join a squad and play large scale PVP with clear objectives with people who want to communicate (and can because our voip system isn't utter trash like Arma!) without any problems at all.
Here's a few quotes from people who have asked the same question.
Imagine fully organized and tactical arma 2/3 with everyone having a mic and ACRE/Task force radio, ACE mod with medical system and the normal insurgents and insurgency mode (as well as others). But it is 100 player pvp, and you dont have to install mods, wait in base for an hour getting geared up etc, its all instant and awesome.
Squad is definitely easier to jump into. The mechanics feel authentic, gritty, and realistic, without all of ArmA's robotic structure and strange, almost arbitrary complexities. It's also, in my opinion, a better multiplayer experience with a more accepting and friendly community. You also don't have to install 400 mods to make it fun like you do with ArmA.