Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 45,965
Wrong thread.
Last edited:
** Official** Starfield - Mods and Tweaks
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
Soldato
Last edited:
Soldato
I've found a few more really good ones earlier today when trying to setup the Neutral LUT Colour one from NexusMods, they work flawlessly. Simple case of copy & pasting nothing really more needs to be done as im guessing we've all got the StarfieldCustom.ini setup and working by now.
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/88?tab=description (Cleaner and faster loading intro)
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/270?tab=description (Smooth Ship Aiming Reticle)
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/214?tab=description (Better HUD)
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/88?tab=description (Cleaner and faster loading intro)
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/270?tab=description (Smooth Ship Aiming Reticle)
https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/214?tab=description (Better HUD)
Last edited:
Soldato
Is the Neutral LUTs the one to go to sort out the grey looking black? Is there any performance hit when using it?
Soldato
What's the dlss mode like?
Free one is good, nice bump in fps using dlss2 and i think theres one for dlss3 now too. Paid one DLSS3.5 with FG is even better if you have a 4000 series card.
The Puredark DLSS3.5 with FG preset modes if anyone is wondering what each preset does:
Preset A: Intended for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes. An older variant best suited to combat ghosting for elements with missing inputs, such as motion vectors.
Preset B: Intended for Ultra Performance mode. Similar to Preset A but for Ultra Performance mode.
Preset C: Intended for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes. Generally favors current frame information; well suited for fast-paced game content.
Preset D: Default preset for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes; generally favors image stability.
Preset E: A development model that is not currently used.
Preset F: Default preset for Ultra Performance and DLAA modes.
Preset A: Intended for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes. An older variant best suited to combat ghosting for elements with missing inputs, such as motion vectors.
Preset B: Intended for Ultra Performance mode. Similar to Preset A but for Ultra Performance mode.
Preset C: Intended for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes. Generally favors current frame information; well suited for fast-paced game content.
Preset D: Default preset for Performance/Balanced/Quality modes; generally favors image stability.
Preset E: A development model that is not currently used.
Preset F: Default preset for Ultra Performance and DLAA modes.
Last edited:
Soldato
OK thanks mate, playing @1440p with a 3090. Is 3.5 just for 4000 series?
Man of Honour
Every effect remade!
www.nexusmods.com
EXE - Effect Textures Enhanced
Every last visual effect in Starfield remade and improved. *NOT Ai UPSCALE!!!* This will enhance your game in a big way. Muzzleflashes, storms, blood, explosions, lasers, and everything else.
www.nexusmods.com
I tried to install the wide-screen fix and the intro remover mods but they didn't install for some reason.
Are you all installing manually or using Mod Organizer?
Are you all installing manually or using Mod Organizer?
You can use 3.5 but wont be able to use frame gen.
I do find it odd that the usual suspects are complaining that FSR is not as "stable for IQ" as DLSS. They then go all gooey and moist over the fact a Frame Gen DLSS mod is released that... checks notes "causes IQ issues", such as ghosting on the crosshairs.
I'm not dissing the mod itself. It's more the hypocrisy of DLSS being better because "stability". I have been back and forth between the 2.5 DLSS mod and FSR and you have to pixel peep at 4K quality (75% scaling) to see any differences and it's win some lose some but overall almost identical. The one area DLSS won easily was the ticker tape on the security hut near the space dock. In FSR it is blurred while standing still but fine when you move. If you are using lower than 4K DLSS might be better but I haven't tested it.
I'm not dissing the mod itself. It's more the hypocrisy of DLSS being better because "stability". I have been back and forth between the 2.5 DLSS mod and FSR and you have to pixel peep at 4K quality (75% scaling) to see any differences and it's win some lose some but overall almost identical. The one area DLSS won easily was the ticker tape on the security hut near the space dock. In FSR it is blurred while standing still but fine when you move. If you are using lower than 4K DLSS might be better but I haven't tested it.
Last edited:
Soldato
He should've left it in beta and not stopped refining it....
Man of Honour
The manual method here with anything off nexus. Are you putting the mod files in the correct folder under my documents > My games etc?
I'm certainly not a usual suspect, but can assure you that enabling FSR causes consistent CTD for me - the game is literally unplayable with it.
Yea, maybe I missed something really obvious.
I'm off to work for a few weeks anyway, so hopefully the mods have been refined by the time I get back.
I mean IQ stability. I can't speak for lower resolutions as I play at 4k with 75% - 80% scaling. One of these is DLSS and the other FSR at 4K with 75% scaling qualty and no sharpening. I have deliberately not labelled either, so it is a blind test.
