***Official Unigine Heaven DX11 3.0 Benchmark Scores***

[Twirlywoos]

Virtu MVP falsifies scores, I can't trust any score as mentioned on another forum that OCUK like to post artificial scores.

 

[Besty]

I did some updated two card scores with the 12.4 driver.

2 x XFX 7970 = 4568 (1080p), 4973 (1050p)

Clocks: 1285/[email protected]. 3960k/[email protected]









http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/z5gya/

 

[Money Talks]

GTX 690 on a 930 running at 4.3.

 

[dave_beast]

GTX 690 on a 930 running at 4.3.

Min fps 14? Wouldn't of thought a 930 would nerf it that much?

 

[Gregster]

Min fps 14? Wouldn't of thought a 930 would nerf it that much?

and at only 1050P...Something wrong I would say.

 

[Money Talks]

I think it was a lag spike here is a better one with extreme tesselation

 

[Money Talks]

another with cpu at 4.4 instead of 4.3 like above

 

[dave_beast]

Can you try it again based on the settings at the start of this thread and see if the min fps is still low?

 

[555BUK]

El-cheapo 7850 with a mild overclock (1376MHz core / 1500MHz mem).

 

[spixelspixel]

El-cheapo 7850 with a mild overclock (1376MHz core / 1500MHz mem).

yep a very mild oc stock around 45 fps?

 

[555BUK]

yep a very mild oc stock around 45 fps?

Stock are in the region of 40-45fps.

Here's another 7850 at 1376/1500 with MVP turned on. Not trying to make the mighty 7900 and GTX600 owners jealous of my weedy 7850.

 

[Alz_D]

Shame the posts got deleted but gives me an excuse to upload this run:

Still using 2 x HIS 7950's under water
1.268 volts 1240 core 1600 memory
Validation Link


Link To Original


Link To Original

I will get to 4000 at some point. Not happening at the minute for me though

 

[Arron17]

Stock are in the region of 40-45fps.

Here's another 7850 at 1376/1500 with MVP turned on. Not trying to make the mighty 7900 and GTX600 owners jealous of my weedy 7850.

I really don't understand how mvp works, my 7850 is clocked at 1200/1500 and I get an FPS of 82.6 and a score of 2081 in heaven...

 

[555BUK]

I really don't understand how mvp works, my 7850 is clocked at 1200/1500 and I get an FPS of 82.6 and a score of 2081 in heaven...

Put simply, it places some of the less demanding workload onto the iGPU, allowing the main graphics card to concentrate on more demanding stuff. Heaven and 3DMark11 show massive gains, BF3 gain about 10%, whilst other games have varying results (not all are positive). I am guessing that you have an Ivy Bridge processor, which gives better iGPU assisted results than my Sandy Bridge. The latest Virtu update seems to have supplied big gains for AMD cards.

 

[Craterloads]

1680 x 1050

GTX 680 - 1328Mhz Core / 7430Mhz Mem @ 100mV & 132% Power Boost

Score is - 2474



http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/137/1050p.jpg/

 

[Craterloads]

1920 x 1080p

GTX 680 - 1328Mhz Core / 7430Mhz Mem @ 100mV & 132% Power Boost

Score is - 2233



http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/6/1080pv.jpg/

 

[Arron17]

Put simply, it places some of the less demanding workload onto the iGPU, allowing the main graphics card to concentrate on more demanding stuff. Heaven and 3DMark11 show massive gains, BF3 gain about 10%, whilst other games have varying results (not all are positive). I am guessing that you have an Ivy Bridge processor, which gives better iGPU assisted results than my Sandy Bridge. The latest Virtu update seems to have supplied big gains for AMD cards.

Ah yeh, I didn't even look at your CPU. It seems that applications that have hyperformance enabled get fps boosts but virtual vsync seems to drop fps.

I tried enabling hyperformance for crysis 2 which isn't supported by it and you get an fps boost but it doesn't render objects properly so it's kind of useless.

 

[Besty]

1920 x 1080p

GTX 680 - 1328Mhz Core / 7430Mhz Mem @ 100mV & 132% Power Boost

Score is - 2233



http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/6/1080pv.jpg/

Nice core clocks.

 

[Money Talks]

Can you try it again based on the settings at the start of this thread and see if the min fps is still low?

Here you go,like i said before,it was lag spike....new bench as you requested.
Gigabyte Gtx 690
When the drivers mature im sure i can go even higher as the drivers atm are not the best.

 

[FMTopfan]

Here you go,like i said before,it was lag spike....new bench as you requested.
Gigabyte Gtx 690
When the drivers mature im sure i can go even higher as the drivers atm are not the best.

That score looks good for 'immature' drivers, wonder if we will get someone with quad SLI to run these settings for giggles! Found this recent YT video (301.34 drivers) and this one maxed 1080p as some idea.

Can't quite see the details in screenshot hence...

*Added 23/03/12* - Screenshots should resized to no more than 1024 pixels wide with a link to original