3) Because you just aren't as good with some tanks as others?
I can't take your OP accusations seriously, considering the amount of tanks you throw it about with and the fact you denied that arty was OP before the 8.6 patch.
I never said arty wasnt overpowered. I said it was situationally overpowered, eg when people sit out in the open or camp in one spot expecting not to get shot. Several people (seems you are included in this) seem to think arty pre 8.6 could hit a tank whether it was stationary, moving or doing a backflip everytime without fail for 2000 + damage. In reality it is nothing like that. Sure sometimes you could do that but half the time that didnt happen. If arty was as overpowered as you claim then every arty every game would be topping the scoreboard with damage and kills. Sure sometimes they were at the top but not every game without fail. In general my T10 tanks have higher average damage than my t8 arty at the time. If your unable to adapt and persist in sitting in places where its easy for arty to hit you expecting to have god mode vs them, then the issue isnt the arty but with you.
Magic Russianness I can't say I've noticed all that much. It seems to me that most tanks seem to magically bounce shots when they are low on health and other factors tend to come into affect against Russians.
A russian bias has always existed in the game but you seem to want to deny it, I'm not sure why. Is it because you rely on this too much? A good example is a T-34-2 vs T44. I prefer the T-34-2 as a medium tank. Im not really a fan of the T44 but my stats in the T44 are much higher. On paper the T-34-2 has the better armor and does bounce more shots than the T44, but the T44 will often absorb shorts, causing 0 damage. Its an easy tank to play because of this because you effectively have a much higher chance of survival. A Few weeks ago on Arctic Region starting on the west, my self in a T44 and Nuttah in a T32 were the only tanks to go south so we sat in base to defend. I put my T44 covering the hull of his tank so he could hull down and hopefully win. For the most part, the side of my tank was showing to several T8 heavys and td's. I must have taken 15 shots before I died, because so many of them were "penetration" shots.
Then we can talk about HEAT. Most HEAT ammo was nerfed in 8.6, reducing its pen. This ranges from the 105mm guns that were used by the Pz IV and M4 as well as all the way up to tier 10. Interestingly tho the 152mm gun from the SU-152 didnt have its HEAT penetration reduced but instead BUFFED. It went from around 210? mm of penetration (enough to penetrate most t8 heavies frontally, especially considering the calibre of the round against sloping targets) to around 250mm which is enough to reliably pen T9 and T10 heavys. For a gun that I can say definatly wasnt bad in anyway (was capable of 1 shotting t7 tanks and 2 shotting t8 tanks) to get a buff is beyond stupid. But guess what, its a russian tank so its ok. Do you think its was underpowered pre 8.6 and needed that buff to bring it inline with other T7 TD's?
I can't say I've really noticed much of an accuracy buff since the patch, Russian tanks still miss at range a lot more than the British or German tanks do. The IS7's gun is not massively dependable, it does bounce even when you aim at the enemy weak spots, when it hits, it does hit hard, but the IS4's gun is a bit more dependable in a tight spot as is the T110E5's...
BL-10 as a gun may be very good, but the rest of the ISU isn't all that favourable, plus it has a very long reload, however I would say that the gun is arguably OP at Tier 8.
ISU to me is easily the best T8 TD and the easiest to play. Even more so into higher tiers. Sure it doesnt have bouncy armor, but then which does? The T28 has decent armor but its extremly slow. T28 prototype has resonable armor but the turret isnt that strong. Mle 48 on paper has decent armor, but everyone just aims for the weakspot and pens without fail. (This tank also had its penetration dropped in 8.6). Ferdy has ok ish armor, but with premium ammo around its very easy to pen it, as most t7/ t8 tanks have more than 200mm of penetration with premium ammo and can just penetrate the superstructure. I dont have any exprience of the SU101 or the british one (except it has a nice easy to pen weakspot on top).
The ISU again has the advantage of absorbing shots as well as decent camo and super high penetration coupled with high alpha. It has more penetration than t9 td's for god sake. Its no different to play it at t8 then at 9/10 because you can still easily pen everything in the game and you still absorb shots but get more xp for shooting tanks above your tier.
Ke? Is it the same IS7 we're driving? At the moment its barely use through CW as its so poor... Pen and gun is unreliable, eats gold shots almost everywhere...
If your basing it off clan war performance, isnt every tank weak when an Obj 268 can auto aim things with 'balanced' premium ammo with 450mm of penetration? If an IS-7 is weak / underpowered because of clan wars, what does that mean for the KV-1S and IS-3 that are always used in great numbers in company battles?
Of course in a random battle its a different story, but then there you get players who are trying to pen it with autoaim...
Plenty of tanks are strong if people are using autoim. I'm comparing the IS7 to the T110E5 in general performance and it feels to me like a better overall tank especially when you consider the penetration reduction on the american gun. When the T110 was first in the game it was a monster of a tank, easily better than the IS-7. It had its ROF reduced and it felt like a stealth nerf to the lower plate and commander hatch (both ceased to bounce a lot of shots compared to before.) T110 suffers from horrible side and rear armor on both the turret and hull, where as the IS-7 has one of the best turrets in the game and decent upper hull armor.
Ps. T69 seems to be great when you get a hang of it and know when to shoot without gold... With the promo Im averaging 1k xp with 20k+ profit after repairs and ammo! Just another 80k to the T9
Nice to see someone using regular ammo for a change in that. It felt like the tank had been balanced around using premium ammo as a lot of people said it wasnt great when using regular ammo. Looking foward to getting mine soon.
I recall Puppet calling the 50 100 OP aged ago, I think he considers every tank that Nuttah drives to be OP
Well the IS-4 @ Tier 9 was extremly strong if you had half a clue of how to play it, especially when premium ammo costed gold. The T29 is very strong at T7 and is over powered in a hull down environment. You of all people should be able to admit that. From what I have played of the 50 100 it is a very easy tank to play and do damage in.
He also kept saying before he got the T57 "I hope they dont nerf it before I get it" suggesting he thought the tank was perfoming above average, otherwise why would it get nerfed?