Soldato
Ah well if it's perfect in "some" games then there is nothing to worry about.
Exactly, no issue at all.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ah well if it's perfect in "some" games then there is nothing to worry about.
Maybe all the idiots and simpletons earn more money than you because they aren't as 'simpleton' as you think they are.
You can get a 27 inch 4k 144hz panel for way less than £1k, you are cherry picking the most expensive - and you don't need an £800 CPU either. You'll be moaning that you cant afford the top end mountain bike because it's £10k and those that are buying them are spoiling it for you because you cant afford one, no wait, you are entitled to one, but not at that price.
Gaming for simpletons sits firmly in consoles, along with their affordable price. Not that this iteration of consoles are ever going to do 120hz @ 4k and 1440p isn't even supported apparently.
A good review of OLEDS - https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/lg_cx_oled.htm
A good review of OLEDS - https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/lg_cx_oled.htm
I think its hard to deny PC gamers are consistently taken for a ride and taken advantage of.
This.
Suspect the problem with non-OLED monitors is how many of them have response times above the maximum for 100% refresh rate compliance.
Ie if you have a 165 Hz monitor your maximum pixel transition time is ~6ms. If many of your pixel transitions take longer than this, then you don't "really" have a 165 Hz experience. This is especially true for VA and some IPS in dark scenes.
If you have 100% pixel transitions under 6ms then you have a true 165 Hz display.
Blurbusters seem to think the end game is 1000 Hz. With today's LCD tech I'm not convinced that anything above 144Hz is really worth the money. You'll pay out the wazzoo for it also
But 60Hz will always be awful no matter what display tech you use 120-165Hz I think is the sweat spot right now.
I think you had the 'right' board originally
Try in here
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/forums/threads/lg-48cx-oled-4k-120-hz.18883464/
Problem I have with it is the amount of OLED's for sale on Ebay with burn in and panel issues. Loads of them, even recent models B's C's and CX's. Plus it seems they are still a bit fiddly to get working and you'll need a 3000 series+ to use them at 4k 120hz as only those cards have HDMI 2.1.
Still need to put my PC in the living room and try it on my OLED but not got round to getting an HDMI 2.1 lead yet.
seems they have more lag than gaming monitors also
OLED has much better response time so you are going to get better clarity and less blur with motion.
I've been gaming on OLED TV's since 2016 and yes they are amazing
Just waiting to see if I can unleash 4k/120hz when the Nvidia GPU I ordered in September eventually arrives!
Been saying this for the last 3+ years now
Definitely true in my experience and to my eyes.
Give me a rock solid 60FPS/60hz vsync on oled over FPS fluctuating between 50-120 on a freesync 144hz LCD screen any day of the week. Motion clarity and smoothness is far superior and don't even get me started on the IQ difference.....
Just ordered an HDMI 2.1 cable t
If you have framerates fluctuating that wide (50-120) then you have other issues - bottlenecking somewhere or a poorly optimized game. 60hz fine for many games but fast paced - first person, driving or piloting games then then 60hz aint got nothing on 100hz+
September?
Many of us will be aware of OLED's superior picture and other attributes.Been saying this for the last 3+ years now
Definitely true in my experience and to my eyes.
Give me a rock solid 60FPS/60hz vsync on oled over FPS fluctuating between 50-120 on a freesync 144hz LCD screen any day of the week. Motion clarity and smoothness is far superior and don't even get me started on the IQ difference.....
Many of us will be aware of OLED's superior picture and other attributes.
The problem is for those of us who want one screen to rule them all
OLED + Windows UI (think Excel or Visual Studio open for 8 hours), or a lot of MMO gaming with a static UI..
And the other problem for OLED on the desktop is the size. 48" is just too big for the smallest available size Ain't many of us that can fit 48" in...
Been saying this for the last 3+ years now
Definitely true in my experience and to my eyes.
Give me a rock solid 60FPS/60hz vsync on oled over FPS fluctuating between 50-120 on a freesync 144hz LCD screen any day of the week. Motion clarity and smoothness is far superior and don't even get me started on the IQ difference.....
Ah well if it's perfect in "some" games then there is nothing to worry about.
Linus Tech tips and The Good Old Gamer have videos up which make for interesting viewing
OLED + Ryzen 3100/b450mobo/3600cpu + 2070/5700 gpu = smoother more clarity gaming experience than a mad expensive high end rig (3080/6800) + 360Hz monitor?
Anyone got an OLED they game on, that can confirm this? This could be a huge shift away from the mindset of needing a crazy high end refresh rate monitor setup and expensive GPU?
GOOD OLD GAMER
https://youtu.be/FGmY5vvhtAA
LINUS TECH
https://youtu.be/x9n8Hz_RLqw
The price of OLEDs though