One Night Ultimate OcUK Werewolf - Game 2
- Thread starter iviv
- Start date
Soldato
Thanks for that.
It confirms to me that amongst Ekim, Egon and Brabbinho there is at least 1 liar.
I was also dealt villager.
We need the other roles to step up and tell us what they know.
Soldato
To recap before this all get too complicated, current claims are:
Brabbinho - Villager
Chriscubed - Robber (Target not declared)
Egon - Villager
Ekim - Villager
Kaiowas - Villager
shorttricky
Shamikebab - Troublemaker (Targets not declared)
Brabbinho - Villager
Chriscubed - Robber (Target not declared)
Egon - Villager
Ekim - Villager
Kaiowas - Villager
shorttricky
Shamikebab - Troublemaker (Targets not declared)
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 1,080
Morning all.
That's a lot of villagers
I was the seer - I checked Shami, who was indeed the Troublemaker.
That's a lot of villagers
I was the seer - I checked Shami, who was indeed the Troublemaker.
Soldato
Shami's targets are less important at this time as it will only give us information regarding the movement of the roles of 2 individuals without giving us any further information on what those roles were.
On the other hand I'd be interested to hear what Chris has to say as his role allows him to confirm someone else's claim.
Soldato
At least everyone is here this game!
Kaiowas' logic makes sense, the information that Chris has is more important to us at this stage.
Kaiowas' logic makes sense, the information that Chris has is more important to us at this stage.
Soldato
I believe everyone has claimed haven't they?
Just because people have claimed doesn't mean we know what the roles are. I am pretty sure we have already had a number of lies within this thread.
Soldato
Whilst it is already certain that there are lies there somewhere. The best first course of action is to assume everyone is telling the truth then highlight inconsistencies that prove otherwise
At present the only inconsistency we have is 4 people claiming 3 villager roles and we are still awaiting information that may help partially resolve that issue.
Soldato
Exactly! Chris's info will help us to confirm one of those lies (as long as he is telling the truth)
The troublemakers info is useful, but not as important at this satge.
That's what Kaiowas is saying.
This is tough as I can see two angles on this.
1) Chris can confirm a role. If he isn't actually the robber we are giving him the chance to back up someone else's story who may be lying
2) Shami and Short are currently the only two people in the game backing up each others story, can we trust them? If we get Shami's version of the events now that potentially sticks him in a lie if they haven't been truthful to date.
Tough decisions. Will see how it plays out.
1) Chris can confirm a role. If he isn't actually the robber we are giving him the chance to back up someone else's story who may be lying
2) Shami and Short are currently the only two people in the game backing up each others story, can we trust them? If we get Shami's version of the events now that potentially sticks him in a lie if they haven't been truthful to date.
Tough decisions. Will see how it plays out.
Actually, thinking about it you're right for now I suppose. As the troublemakers info actually shouldn't change too much for now.
Ignore me.
This game is getting in to my head.
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 1,080
Caporegime
I would be interested to hear what chris says before I talk about who I swapped.
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 1,080
This is only my second ever game, so if I've blown an obvious tactic there I do apologise.
Last game, knowing 2 out of the middle really didn't help (certainly not me anyway). It showed we had some liars, but not who or how.
I found it much more useful having one piece of information (I was the robber last game) because I at least knew someone's intentions.
Shami just seems like a dodgy sort, I thought I'd like to know what he was up to
